Democrats are advocating peaceful protest, investigations and impeachment to remove Trump.For the last 7 months your side has been complaining about the Russian investigations from the left not violent rhetoric from democrat leadership or the media because they are not doing that.
Madonna wants to blow up the WH, Kathy Griffin wants to decapitate the President, NY theatre group has a play depicting assassination, etc., etc. and this is just the latest. Peaceful? Lots of crazy leftists out there get pumped up over this nonsense. Add in a hysterical media and their campaign of mis-information, democratic leadership running around with their hair on fire as if Russian troops are making beach landing on the west coast, and you have a recipe for violence. Don't pretend like this stuff has no influence.
Tell you what, you post links to all the MSM negative articles and opinion pieces on Obama. You can go back 8 years. I'll post all the MSM negative articles and opinion pieces on Trump since he announced his campaign. Whoever posts the most, wins. Say $100 gentleman's bet. You in?
Similar to Joe Walsh and Ted Nugent threatening Obama.A few celebrities going to far is not leftist media and democratic leadership advocate removing Trump, and by extension Republicans, using any means necessary.
Harvard Study Reveals Huge Extent of Anti-Trump Media Bias By Heat Street Staff|7:24 am, May 19, 2017 A major new study out of Harvard University has revealed the true extent of the mainstream media’s bias against Donald Trump. Academics at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzed coverage from Trump’s first 100 days in office across 10 major TV and print outlets. They found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations: The academics based their study on seven US outlets and three European ones. In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Timesand the German public broadcaster ARD. Every outlet was negative more often than positive. Only Fox News, which features some of Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters and is often given special access to the President, even came close to positivity. Fox was ranked 52% negative and 48% positive. The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative. On the economy, the proportion was more balanced – 54% negative to 46% positive: The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on Syria. Around 80% of all reports were positive about that. The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obama’s first 100 days got a good write-up overall – with 59% of reports positive. Bill Clinton and George W Bush got overall negative coverage, it found, but to a much lesser extent than Trump. Clinton’s first 100 days got 40% positivity, while Bush’s got 43%: Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the media is unprecedented in its hostility. This study suggests that, at least when it comes to recent history, he’s right.