I can find any number of judges who believe a man can become a woman simply by saying so. It's easy to find numerous medial professionals who will happily sexually mutilate a child. There are countless teachers who are only too happy to mind fuck every student they stand in front of. And there are millions upon millions of Americans who enthusiastically facilitate an open border invasion without a second thought as to the consequences. They're all wrong, every last one of them regardless of the current interpretation of constitutional law and medical opinions. Trump, in this instance, is right to challenge the court as to what constitutes a legal deportation. The current ruling is wrong and needs to be amended.
You don’t understand the foundations you’re standing on. These rights didn’t come from your tribe. They came from centuries of legal development, from British common law through the U.S. Constitution, rooted in a core idea: everyone under a government’s power deserves due process, not just those it finds convenient. Strip that away, and you're not protecting your country, you’re begging to be ruled by raw power. You think it’ll never turn on you. But history says otherwise. You call others stupid, but the truth is, you’re burning the scaffolding that made your life secure and you don’t even know it.
Moron, the man in question and the subject of this thread is not a gangbanger. Crack a window and get some air.
What matters is precedent. Resistance by Agnes Humbert Context: A French art historian who joined the resistance against the Nazis. Relevance: Personal memoir of reaching a moral breaking point, then acting, knowing the risks. Quote: “It is not enough to hate, one must also act.” Agnes Humbert’s breaking point came in June 1940, right after the Nazi occupation of Paris. She had been a respected art historian, working at the Musée de l’Homme. When France surrendered to Hitler’s forces, she was staggered by how quickly many around her accepted collaboration as the new normal—including colleagues, academics, and former friends. What pushed her over the edge wasn’t just the political betrayal, but the moral collapse of her society, the speed at which people bent the knee. She wrote in her journal: > “I am choking with rage... I can’t accept this submission. I refuse to live on my knees.” Rather than flee or wait, she joined a small group of intellectuals and workers to form one of the very first resistance cells in occupied France, right from inside the museum. They wrote and distributed leaflets denouncing Nazi ideology and Vichy collaborators. She fully understood that this was life-threatening work—but her conscience wouldn’t allow her silence. Later arrested, tortured, and sent to a forced labor camp in Germany, she survived and wrote her memoir Résistance (published posthumously in English in 2008). It remains one of the most vivid personal accounts of moral clarity during a time when most people chose fear or apathy. Her story is proof that you don’t need to be a soldier to fight fascism. You need a breaking point—and the courage not to look away once you reach it.
Yes. Very. Except the subject of the thread is not a laughing matter. The man's life hangs in the balance. Assuming he's still alive.
What makes the Abrego Garcia case so dangerous? It’s not really about immigration, or gangs, or even law enforcement. It’s about sending a message: “We will do what we want, and not even the Supreme Court can stop us.” This is a power play, not a policy debate. By deporting a man the Court explicitly said should not be deported, without new evidence and against a backdrop of judicial defiance, the administration is: Testing limits of institutional resistance Conditioning the public to accept executive supremacy Normalizing lawlessness under the guise of strength
I appreciate your reasoned response. Due process is a nice concept, occasionally enacted. Break the foundation of trust that the people and government should share, expect that foundation to show cracks. Laws were broken, or at least willfully ignored to facilitate mass illegal immigration. Expect the same as the pendulum swings back. The system is broken. The fix will be messy. Neither party has the solution. That should come as no surprise seeing how both parties broke it, intentionally.
No No one cares what fantasy you can come up with... the conservative SC disagrees with you...take the LOSS... you are out of your league here and digging a deeper whole. Your opinion that non citizens shouldn't have rights is ....... just...... wait for it.... your opinion. But you are wrong.