In Colombia (and Cambodia etc.) you get a lot of Amercian guys JUST LIKE Echopoop and Mercor who checked the age of consent and thought woohoo! It's not a crime! Book a holiday. It's technically not child abuse in their minds and that's it. Just say under the radar. And they also admire Trump. Go figure. All pedophiles are narcissists and even if a narcissist is not one, you can be confident he is abusing older girls in ways even if it's just wretched emotional abuse. They all think everything is excused because they are bringing money to "working girls" like they are really saints.
I was honestly hoping for some semblance of an intellectual challenge here, but clearly, that was asking far too much of you. Instead of addressing the actual point about evidence standards, a topic you predictably fled from the moment facts became inconvenient, you vomit up this... this putrid stew of logical fallacies. This isn't a debate; it's a demonstration. A demonstration of profound intellectual dishonesty. You don't engage, you smear. You don't reason, you deflect. You don't use facts, you invent stereotypes. And frankly, only someone operating with a severely limited cognitive capacity, a truly low IQ, would think this barrage of cheap shots, logical failures, and prejudiced fantasies actually constitutes a persuasive argument or lands any kind of blow. It's the argumentative equivalent of a chimpanzee throwing its own feces...messy, meaningless, and deeply revealing of the creature's primitive state. You're not equipped for this conversation, or likely, any conversation requiring actual thought. You are a waste of time.
The standard of evidence in civil cases is "preponderance of the evidence," and a unanimous jury found Trump liable. That means, legally, he is a sexual abuser. You may dislike the outcome, but legal judgments aren't optional depending on your feelings. In fact, in many states, around 41 at the time, his actions would qualify as rape. New York's narrower legal definition doesn’t change the nature of the act, only the terminology used in court. To deny this is to misunderstand or deliberately distort how the legal system functions. Only civilians who have never built a prosecution case and gone to trial, think you can disregard a judgement based on you don't like the result because it makes you look bad carrying his stain.
I said good day. I am not going to waste my time with someone that is so severely cognitively challenged.
Really after all theses years, crushing objectivists under my heel is pretty meh. No gang members allowed in this prison, so he's not considered a gang member then. An inside look at the El Salvador prison where Kilmar Abrego Garcia was moved after supermax site Gang members aren't allowed at the penitentiary. The U.S. government has been ordered to facilitate the return of the man who the Trump administration has alleged is a member of MS-13. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kilmar-abrego-garcia-el-salvador-prison-rcna203429
Articles of Impeachment Filed Against Donald Trump For Abuse of Power and Defying the Constitution April 28, 2025, 9:10 PM EDT / Updated April 29, 2025, 7:39 AM EDT Rep. Shri Thanedar introduced seven articles accusing Trump of overreach, violating court orders, and threatening U.S. democracy. ...... One key example is the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongly sent to El Salvador, despite a 9-0 ruling from the Supreme Court saying he should not be removed. “Donald Trump has already done real damage to our democracy, but defying a unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court ruling, that has to be the one final straw,” Thanedar said. “It’s time we impeach Donald J. Trump.” https://dailyboulder.com/articles-o...W4sF6Zm8-SWIxaxkQ0_aem_0pr36t-kuCFK1Fn4DycNIQ
Do the Democrats have a majority in the House? Do they have a super-majority in the Senate? Yeah, this is not going anywhere. It is all for show.
Of course but the other side if the coin would be a counter that nobody raised objection to his actions. Everyone is tired of performative politics however some background stuff must continue. After the mid-terms, there's a fair chance for a third time lucky.