Are they covering up Abrego Garcia's death or something?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tuxan, Apr 14, 2025.

  1. If you lived in New York in 1995 and 1996 and Carroll accused @Tuxan of rape, there would be exactly the same amount of evidence against @Tuxan as there is against Trump.
     
    #171     Apr 29, 2025
  2. Tuxan

    Tuxan

    A Thailand monger who has a rapist-positive self image. I guess you are Muslim then so the burden of proof is several male relatives witnessing the rape.

    Trump's own wife detailed him raping her. It's in the Apprentice movie and Trump has not sued.

    Shut the fuck up. You support this, you are part of it.
     
    #172     Apr 29, 2025
  3. Mercor

    Mercor

    No facts needed for Manhattan juries
    In the belly of the beast

    Manhattan voted 95% for Harris
     
    #173     Apr 29, 2025
    echopulse likes this.
  4. Tuxan

    Tuxan

    And this is the problem, facts don't matter to trained liars like you, Trump got 17.2 percent of the vote. That's plenty to for a skilled team to get a more balanced jury and the verdict was UNAMINOUS.
     
    #174     Apr 29, 2025
  5. Simple prove me wrong.

    You are incapable of being objective. There is no way you had anything to do with law enforcement of any kind. You were never a forest ranger, game warden, or whatever you claim to be. Or, you really sucked at your job.
     
    #175     Apr 29, 2025
  6. Wow, you just outed yourself as a bigoted Islamophobic racist. I don't engage with racist.
     
    #176     Apr 29, 2025
  7. Tuxan

    Tuxan

    Quit your monger abuser-positive game, get a Samsung.

     
    #177     Apr 29, 2025
  8. @Tuxan
    LOL. You can't. LOL.

    The fact that you vomit nothing but ad hominem filth and rickety strawman bullshit, and genuinely think that constitutes 'winning' an argument tells everyone you're scraping the absolute bottom of the cognitive barrel, barely above drooling.
     
    #178     Apr 29, 2025
  9. Tuxan

    Tuxan

    You have a piece of your brain not working, the part that allows you to perceive the moral and ethical part of the spectrum. As is the case with most libertarians.
     
    #179     Apr 29, 2025
  10. Incapable of refuting facts, you immediately resort to pseudo-scientific ad hominem and sweeping generalizations.

    Your argument is the intellectual equivalent of a toddler throwing a tantrum because they got caught.

    It's a cowardly deflection. Resorting to a cowardly deflection like laughably crude strawmen is pathetic enough, but the staggering level of terminal stupidity required to actually believe that wins anything reveals a mind barely above pond scum.

    This is last refuge of someone with no argument and even less integrity.
     
    #180     Apr 29, 2025