On Real Time this week he tries to explain that it's not that Trump is Hitler, he is using the same playbook because Trump copies things he sees working. This draws abhorrent people to him. Unfortunately Maher missed the point completely as he often does.
In March 2024, George Stephanopoulos of ABC News repeatedly made false statements that the jury found Trump liable for rape
You're quibbling over semantics when he has been a sexual abuser his whole life, including a conviction.
I dont quib...I never bring this non-issue up Its only you guys who are obsessed with what Trump does with his dick The whole NYC court system is obsessed with this
The man is a serial creep. Deal with it better. If it was a woman or daughter in your life dealing with Trump you'd be singing a different tune. But that's the thing about Trump he's destroying stuff in meaningful ways for so many people yet some of you dicks don't care if it doesn't hit you personally. My point stands Trump has more reason to be in jail then the guy he deported. That's on a legal basis but Trump thinks he lives above the law. That should concern you it's very Hitler of him to do so.
We know exactly what the judgement was and that it was the equivalent of rape is most places that don't have a very narrow definition like NYC has. They are changing that to match most of the rest of the country because of Trump's case. This is a moral matter, something you don't have a capacity for. Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is 'substantially true' in ... 7 Aug 2023 — Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is 'substantially true' in court dismissal · https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge...tion-claim-against-e-jean-carroll-2023-08-07/
A fuller list of states where even back in the 1990s, what Trump did was considered rape. States Where Forcible Finger Insertion Was Considered "Rape" or Equivalent Serious Sexual Assault (1990s) Broad definitions (non-penile penetration = rape/sexual assault): Alaska — Sexual assault statutes included any penetration, including fingers. Arizona — Sexual assault = any non-consensual penetration, not limited to penis. California — Sexual penetration with a foreign object, including fingers, was a felony (rape equivalent). Colorado — Sexual assault included digital penetration. Connecticut — "Sexual assault" statutes included penetration by any object. Delaware — "Unlawful sexual penetration" statutes included digital acts. Florida — Sexual battery covered non-penile penetration. Hawaii — Digital penetration = sexual assault in the first degree. Idaho — Sexual penetration of any kind = rape. Illinois — Sexual assault included penetration by any object. Iowa — Sexual abuse included penetration by fingers. Kansas — Defined rape as any penetration, not just penile. Kentucky — Sexual assault statutes included digital penetration. Louisiana — Aggravated rape included penetration by fingers. Maine — Gross sexual assault statutes included any penetration. Maryland — Sexual offenses (separate from "rape") included digital penetration — very serious charge. Massachusetts — "Aggravated rape" or sexual assault statutes applied to digital penetration. Michigan — Since 1975, non-penile penetration counted as criminal sexual conduct. Minnesota — Criminal sexual conduct laws included digital penetration. Missouri — Forcible sodomy included digital penetration. Montana — Sexual intercourse without consent included digital acts. Nebraska — First-degree sexual assault included digital penetration. Nevada — Sexual assault = any non-consensual penetration. New Hampshire — Aggravated felonious sexual assault covered finger penetration. New Jersey — Sexual assault statutes included digital penetration. New Mexico — Criminal sexual penetration included digital penetration. North Dakota — Sexual assault law included fingers. Ohio — Rape statute included insertion of fingers. Oklahoma — Forcible sodomy laws included digital penetration. Oregon — Rape and sexual assault covered any penetration. Pennsylvania — Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse laws applied to finger penetration. Rhode Island — First-degree sexual assault for non-penile penetration. South Dakota — Rape included any penetration. Tennessee — Aggravated sexual battery for digital penetration. Texas — Sexual assault included digital penetration. Utah — Forcible sexual abuse included fingers. Vermont — Sexual assault statutes included digital penetration. Virginia — Object sexual penetration, considered as serious as rape. Washington — Rape statutes covered digital penetration. West Virginia — Sexual assault laws included finger penetration. Wisconsin — First-degree sexual assault for digital penetration. Wyoming — Sexual assault included fingers. --- States Where It Was More Complicated or "Lesser" than Rape (1990s) Alabama — Penetration by penis = rape; digital penetration = sexual abuse. Arkansas — Penile penetration = rape; other acts = sexual assault. Georgia — Penile penetration = rape; digital penetration = aggravated sexual battery. Indiana — Rape = penile penetration; digital penetration = criminal deviate conduct. Mississippi — Rape = penile; fingers = sexual battery. New York — Rape = penis-vagina; digital = sexual abuse/forcible touching. North Carolina — Similar to NY; digital penetration = sexual offense, not "rape." South Carolina — Digital penetration = criminal sexual conduct (serious, but separately classified). Arkansas — Same distinction: penis for rape, fingers for sexual assault.
View attachment 365557 If a judge believes deportation to El Salvador would send someone to conditions akin to a concentration camp, and due process would not be properly followed, the judge is legally and ethically obligated to try to prevent it. The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear in multiple rulings that even the President cannot bypass due process protections. This is deja moo because it was all hashed out after 9/11. Even Guantánamo Bay prisoners had the right to challenge the state.[/QUOTE] LOL. Total bullshit. "have no jurisdiction over white people in my county." Total lie. No one said that.
Yeah, if they only had evidence of it. Evidence does not exist. Besides Eugene Carroll's testimony, all evidence clearly demonstrates that Trump is innocent.