If you sum only your big winners that make up the profit in its entirety, on the average, how does that sum compare to the sum of losers?
Give me 1 example where this happens, and I'll give you 10 where a stock drops, and you sell it at market, 5 % below the last quote- and then the stock immediately bounces back up. If you are so obtuse to invest in a stock that would dive a few dollars in seconds, you shouldn't be investing anyways. Have fun shaving 1-5% of your profits (atleast) by using market orders.
This is true, but you're referring to some very advanced tactics. A beginning trader can learn much more easily to wait patiently for setups, accept losses, let winners run and basically end up net profitable without mastering the tactics you're referring to. Not that I would dissuade anyone from putting a lot of sweat into mastering this way of trading. Absolute nugget of gold here.
All three numbers (losses on losing trades, top 10% of winning trade gains and other 90% of winning trades) are about the same number, although, of course, the sign on the losses number is negative.
Learn to vary your stops according to market pace (pace is a volume term).. this will lower your losses and move most of the 90% small wnners to larger winners. Your quest for the rule you asked about for stops has been answered in this thread. when you move out of intermediate (after you go dynamic with stop offsets by volume PACE), then you can consider expert which obviates having to have losses. there you will change fractals for trading and begin to recognize that money is made on all price movement and that requires a hold/reversal orientation which is a long way off for most posters in this thread. It looks like no one so far is in that genre.
So we are now to believe that not only do you take 3x the daily trading range, but that you have eliminated all losses. As usual, I am sure you are not prepared to back any of your statements up with facts are you.
"Learn to vary your stops according to market pace (pace is a volume term).. this will lower your losses and move most of the 90% small wnners to larger winners." Not only "No", but "Hell No". I have never before waded into a Jack Hershey post, but this one is far too egregious to let go. Completely acinine statement.
Fortunately, there was never a chance I would even consider taking that advice! I've read enough of his posts to know that there's nothing in anything he says which would add any value to my trading.