I bought the stock on Feb 17 at 57.34. Since then it split 3:2. What on earth are you babbling about????????
Mr Market is previous post: "I bought SAFM at 38.35 on Feb 17, and it's now trading at 35.35. That's down about 7%. Get a clue...." Mr Market now: "I bought the stock on Feb 17 at 57.34." Uuuughhh yeah... Do you have ANY idea what price you actually supposedly bought it at? LMAO peace axeman
The actual purchase price was 57.34...the split adjusted price is 38.35..if this is too difficult for you to understand then there is really no point in continuing THIS discussion. Any other ET'ers speak Mr. Axeman's language? He obviously cannot understand me.
My hat is off to you....this was a crafty set-up. LOL Michael B. P.S. I am not endorsing your methods but I enjoy your writing stye...in its arrogance and then the "to-follow" bashing is a great read....Thank you, please continue. Is all of this real....?
Then you bought it at 57.34, you know, the price it was at WHEN you bought it. Learn to communicate clearly. You must have fur inside your mouth as well peace axeman
In the financial world, once a stock has split, all historical prices, and references to same, are revised to the split-adjusted basis. Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to educate you.
OOOOhhh I see.... thats why you refered to it as 35.35 in your recent post Whats wrong? Arent you aware that in the financial world all references to historical prices are revised to the split-adjusted basis? LMAO Thank you for allowing me to educate you. peace axeman MrMonkey said: "I bought SAFM at 38.35 on Feb 17, and it's now trading at 35.35. That's down about 7%. Get a clue...."
I have no idea what it is you are talking about. Please enlighten the world with regard to what your point is with all of this. Are you claiming that I don't own SAFM anymore or that I made money on it and should have sold it?? what? huh??
Looks like you lost this one, mr.. market. With all your Wharton MBA arrogance, the best you could so for a wife is abby joseph cohen?