Anyone else see Wasserman-Schultz get lit up by Chris Wallace?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Max E., Jan 10, 2012.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    Christy wouldn't go for this.

    <img src="http://iowntheworld.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/dws.jpg" height="300" width=290">
     
    #21     Jan 10, 2012
  2. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    [​IMG]

    The MSM has a very strict "head and upper torso only" rule for Wasserman-Schultz when she appears on camera.

    [​IMG]
     
    #22     Jan 10, 2012
  3. Mercor

    Mercor

    I never said that you fool....

    But your favorite defense of your Dear Leader is to find another example of somebody acting as badly.
     
    #23     Jan 10, 2012
  4. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Moral equivocation, the hallmark of a directionless person.

    IQ-47 doesn't believe in anything. To be contrary is his only purpose.
     
    #24     Jan 10, 2012
  5. Max E.

    Max E.

    You seem to believe that there is a difference between the 2. Gordon Gekko provides a fantastic villain for far left people who dont believe in capitalism, but the bottom line is that NO ONE randomly lends out money without expecting, or securing a return on it, liberals really need to get the ridiculous notion of a free lunch out of their heads.

    Do you honestly believe there is any difference between Buffet and Gecko when a company gets torn apart and salvaged because the company doesnt have enough cash to service their debt?

    Except the government i guess.....

     
    #25     Jan 10, 2012
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    That IS Christie, with a wig on.
     
    #26     Jan 10, 2012
  7. No.I know the cuddly teddy bear grandfather Buffet is just as ruthless as Gekko

    The difference between Obama/Slyndra and Willard/Bain is that Obama promised during his campaign to invest in green energy while Bain /Romeny were Gekkos.Obama was fulfilling a promise to the people who elected him while Romneys motive was millions in personal profit
     
    #27     Jan 10, 2012
  8. My mistake.I just looked it up and that was John_Wensink who said that I thought it was you
     
    #28     Jan 10, 2012
  9. Says the Obama hating conservative who said he would vote for Obama over Paul :cool:
     
    #29     Jan 11, 2012
  10. Max E.

    Max E.

    Well if you are going to go that route, The difference is that Obama invested money which WAS NOT HIS OWN, into ideas which complaetely failed, which he would never be held accountable for, in order to fulfill a political agenda, so it should come as no surprise he didnt expect a return. Do you think that is realistic in the real world? The only reason he was different was because it wasnt his own money, and he didnt expect a return.



     
    #30     Jan 11, 2012