all is noted...but back to the ....uhhh...deception egalitarianism is flawed according to capitalistic thinking as a human wants to benefit from the fruits of his labor...man is doomed to toil in the ground...shouldn't he be decieved? capitalism capitalises on growth...or the illusion of freedom within it...freedom from supression? no? political systems that get the mileage of energy out of its citizens may be most efficient...
why do 95%plus of ALL wealthy people own homes--often multiple homes? even to question the viability of ownership indicates that one is dealing with bottom feeders. regards, surf
LOL, electric! there is a reason that most all wealthy people own and most poor people rent.... pick your poison. surf
Yeah but you got to take advantage of that appreciation by only putting 25% down at best, so that is the equivalent of 28% annually.
all is noted...but back to the ....uhhh...deception egalitarianism is flawed according to capitalistic thinking as a human wants to benefit from the fruits of his labor...man is doomed to toil in the ground...shouldn't he be decieved? capitalism capitalises on growth...or the illusion of freedom within it...freedom from supression? no? political systems that get the mileage of energy out of its citizens may be most efficient... ##################################### You are prisoner of Aristotel ,he's follovers and plagiators CIA Director performed a study of antic cultur in he's youth . If he ask he'm ,you would receive answer(not for press and broadly mass)
That's a valid point, bottom line, it still comes down to counting on future appreciation of house prices. If one is sure that houses will continue to appreciate at past rates, or near past rates, home ownership is a reasonable proposition.
I do, although I am considering selling, downsizing, and paying cash for the next one. I have to much unused sf. Debt free trading makes for stress free trading. P.S. I still read book on trading and no I have never written one on trading.