The reason you switched to wanting to talk about punishment is because you were caught lying about The Clinton case.
Everything I said was true. No crime was committed. Furthermore, there is no punishment laid out for a violation of The PRA. The indictment is bogus on its face and I understand why you are upset. You've been defeated again and weren't even aware of the no punishment aspect.
So you know better than Bill Barr? What are your qualifications as a lawyer on classified material prosecution?
One other item of note. --The Clinton Tapes contained copious amounts of classified information and so are basically the same thing as what Trump had. The Judge allowed Clinton to call them personal records. This mismatch of justice totally exonerated Trump as he would have thought it was ok to remove documents. In any event, there is no punishment for a violation of The PRA and so the entire point is moot. I should also state that the Espionage Act doesn't apply here. It was designed for actual espionage. Both Clinton and Trump may have talked to reporters/historians about classified info. Clinton wasn't charged-----why would Trump be?
Yes, but I need to point out that Barr knows that he is spouting nonsense. He just wants Trump to go down. Bill Barr is one of the main Deep State members.
Then why did Trump hire him? How do you know he is spouting nonsense when you won't even mention your qualifications on prosecuting cases like these?