Those are a lot of points B1S2. Unfortunately quantity doesn't mean anything. There are thousands of websites, papers and other sources that present 'proof' the earth is flat. So the question for a cfitical thinker is: how do I know which sources to trust? The answer to that is quite long, but the two main things to pay attention to are 1) Authority: who is the author? What are their credentials? Do they have interests to defend that might lead to a bias? 2) accuracy: are the facts they present backed up by evidence rhat can be checked? What is their track record? Let's try to answer these two questions here: 1) cyber ninjas were paid by and reported to republicans that claimed the election was stolen without any form of proof. Not people being honestly critical, but people stating it was 'clear' the elections were stolen without any solid arguments. Cyber ninjas had no relevant experience for the job. My conclusion: the chance that they were not at least extremely biased is close to 0. Add incompetence / lack of experience to that and it makes sense to be highly critical of their findings. 2) Facts: in short: all the arguments and data/facts in the report were decisively debunked by experts WITH authority. Again: don't take my word for it but google it for yourself (I honestly and strongly encourage you to do that). So my end conclusion is these auditors were at best too inexperienced and fucked up. It's also possible - and in my opinion more likely - that their report was not aimed at finding the truth, but instead carefully constructed to give people that believe the election was stolen exactly what they desperately wanted to hear. Either way it is clear that the report is untrustworthy. Can you agree B1S2? If not please explain why not.
I am asking for numbers, how many fraudulent votes were discovered, show me the evidence. I didn't ask you a list of lying Republicans who will say anything if the money is right.