Here's a paradoxical opening to a news item: Reuters Friday, April 11, 2003; 3:46 AM TEHRAN (Reuters) - Dozens of supporters of Iraq's main Shi'ite Muslim opposition group stormed the Iraqi embassy in Tehran, tore down pictures of Saddam Hussein and chanted "Death to America" on Friday, witnesses said. ***************** Christ, SH was oppressing them for almost 25 years. Guess they wanted to wait for all the Hussein clan to die of natural causes. They sure as hell didn't have the courage to tear down the SH images while he was around.
Some of the skeptics across the Channel, now eating monstrous portions of crow.... Excerpts: Robert Fisk, The Independent, April 2: The Iraqi army's defences seem impenetrable.....Anyone who doubts that the Iraqi army is prepared to defend its capital should take the highway south of Baghdad. How, I kept asking myself, could the Americans batter their way through these defences? The Americans may say they are 'degrading' the country's defences, but there was little sign of that here Wednesday. Correlli Barnett, author of The Great War, writing in The Daily Mail, April 3: We were told that as Saddam's regime collapsed under the American hi-tech attack, the Iraqi people were going to rise up against him. They were going to welcome the American invaders with joy. They were going to brim over with gratitude for the priceless gift of 'democracy'. But instead, we see the deeply-angered Iraqi people rallying behind Saddam in defence of their land against a foreign invader - just as in 1941, the Russian people rallied behind an even more awful tyrant, Josef Stalin, in resisting the Nazi invaders. Simon Jenkins, columnist, The Times, Mar 28: Baghdad will be near impossible to conquer. John Pilger in the Daily Mirror, April 5: [The Iraqis] are not keeping to the script; and their extraordinary resistance against such overwhelming odds has required intensified propaganda in Washington and London. Andrew Stephen, New Statesman, Mar 31: And they thought it was going to be so easy. They really did believe it: that troops would be welcomed in Iraq, with flowers and hugs and kisses, as liberators for whom they had been waiting so long. Editorial, Marianne, Mar 31: The Iraqis are resisting, bitterly, fiercely. The army is holding firm. The 'crusaders' have not met any happy crowds. Thanks to Bush, Blair, Aznar, if you liked the world of the 1930s, you'll love the 2000s. Claude Imbert, editor of Le Point Mar 28: This expedition of Bush is fuzzy, erratic and in its objectives fantastical. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...10.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/10/ixnewstop.html Anyone seen any compilations of American media, politicians, and retired generals who got it wrong? Please post!!
Resinate this: GERMANY AND JAPAN. Both were destroyed by the U.S. and rebuilt by the U.S. as democracies. Yes, the Germany that was such a U.S. puppet state that they voted against us in the U.N. ! It is absolutely apalling that kids these days don't know the history of the 20th century.
Rubbish? HA ! Its objective historical fact. I dare you to even argue the point, since anybody can open a history book written in any country, and see it for themselves.
I'm happy and free, and happy that Iraq is free from Sadam. The people that are sad about this whole thing desserve to be sad, they have imposed it upon themselves. You lay down with dogs you get fleas. You oppose the overthrow of sadistic dictators, you deserve whatever ridicule comes your way. They should feel lucky that ridicule is all they get.