Ya ya, everything good the old fat orange did it. Anything goes wrong, it's not his fault. Typical inbred whining.
Of course it’s IF. It could be higher. It could be lower. It must be nice to live in the anti science fantasy world that says no one has ever died from these vaccines. Go back to your obsession with OrangeManBad who still lives rent free in the penthouse that is your outhouse mind.
The data isn't even vetted you moron, you are just guessing because all of you Trumptards have always been anti-vaxxers. Nothing new about you cultists and group thinking.
Stupid comment from a stupid retard. Why wouldn’t it be vetted? Probably because no one has ever died from a covid vaccine, amirite? Put your degree in Art History to good use and paint is all a picture of something.
That's not me saying it, that's VAERS itself stating it "When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event." VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning that reports about adverse events are not automatically collected, but require a report to be filed to VAERS. VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html Quoting your own source is stupid comment now? LMFAO Says the dumb fuck who posted a chart without scaling, even art history majors know better.
I’m an American, we don’t call it a “jab.” On this side of the Atlantic it’s a shot. And I got them both. It was easy. A little arm pain is all. The vaccines are not dangerous. They are safe and effective. You have been taking for granted the preventive measures we have had. Now is the time to get vaccinated. Covid will come back in the fall and there won’t be preventive measures to protect you or anyone else then. Be smart. This is not me being disrespectful.
This federal vaccine database is being used to spread misinformation And the CDC has no plans to change it in the near future. https://www.inputmag.com/tech/this-federal-vaccine-database-is-being-used-to-spread-misinformation Anti-vaxxers are utilizing a federal vaccination database to spread fear around the COVID-19 vaccine because, apparently, Facebook’s misinformation network wasn’t enough. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is being misused to purposefully make the COVID-19 vaccine’s side effects seem much worse than they actually are, according to a new report from NPR. The VAERS is meant to be a place where those who have received vaccines can speak to their experiences after being vaccinated, giving the public a legitimate way to understand first-hard vaccination experiences. But NPR’s analysis of the database turned up far too many false or coincidental reports for it to be taken seriously in its current state. People have taken to reporting random health events and claiming they’re related to being vaccinated, which kind of ruins the legitimacy of the project as a whole. Crowdsourced information — especially around health — can be invaluable. But with very minimal moderation (read: none) and no plans to change that in the near future, VAERS has become a case study in how crowdsourcing can end up doing more harm than good. This is nothing new — The VAERS database has been around for decades now and was created partly in response to the anti-vax movement. The goal of the project was always to leave the database as open as possible so the general public could speak to their experiences with vaccination. But the database has always had a problem with misleading information. A death can be reported in conjunction with a vaccine, for example, even if that death was caused by another illness. As you might expect, proponents of the anti-vaccine movement love to use this data for graphics and other reporting. For a very long time, individual reports from VAERS have been cited as if they were full studies of the side effects of vaccination. The individual stories are often taken out of context and used as if they’re verified — which they are not and never have been. Not changing any time soon — Here’s the kicker: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knows about the issue and has no plans to change the system. This is partly a problem of function — VAERS can do what it’s meant to, at least on occasion. It’s one of the easiest ways the CDC can be alerted quickly in the case of severe vaccine responses, for example — it’s how the agency learned about the COVID-19 vaccine’s blood clot problem, for example. Walter Orenstein, a former director of the U.S. immunization program at the CDC, says he thinks keeping VAERS as open as possible is the best way forward. "My feeling is that this is what we have to live with," he says, "because I think it's very important that we have an open and transparent system.” Given that VAERS is absolutely being used for harm, the CDC’s steadfast refusal to update the system or introduce new moderation methods is frustrating. If the rise of social media has taught us anything, it’s that leaving such systems wide open without some system of checks in place can lead to disaster.
Leftist Millenial Rag. Tens of thousands of vaccine deaths and hundreds of thousands of SERIOUS injuries between VAERS, Yellow Card, and EUDRAVIGILANCE.