Or how about a liberal that's trying his level best to pauperize the world with false claims, like your buddy algore... Climategate: Gore falsifies the record Andrew Bolt Al Gore has studied the Climategate emails with his typically rigorous eye and dismissed them as mere piffle: Q: How damaging to your argument was the disclosure of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University? AG: To paraphrase Shakespeare, itâs sound and fury signifying nothing. I havenât read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. These private exchanges between these scientists do not in any way cause any question about the scientific consensus. And in case you think that was a mere slip of the tongue: Q: There is a sense in these e-mails, though, that data was hidden and hoarded, which is the opposite of the case you make [in your book] about having an open and fair debate. AG: I think itâs been taken wildly out of context. The discussion youâre referring to was about two papers that two of these scientists felt shouldnât be accepted as part of the IPCC report. Both of them, in fact, were included, referenced, and discussed. So an e-mail exchange more than 10 years ago including somebodyâs opinion that a particular study isnât any good is one thing, but the fact that the study ended up being included and discussed anyway is a more powerful comment on what the result of the scientific process really is. In fact, thrice denied: AG: These people are examining what they can or should do to deal with the P.R. dimensions of this, but where the scientific consensus is concerned, itâs completely unchanged. What weâre seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly. In fact, as Watts Up With That shows, one Climategate email was from just two months ago. The most recent was sent on November 12 - just a month ago. The emails which have Tom Wigley seeming (to me) to choke on the deceit are all from this year. Phil Jonesâ infamous email urging other Climategate scientists to delete emails is from last year. How closely did Gore read these emails? Did he actually read any at all? Was he lying or just terribly mistaken? What else has he got wrong?
The day you provide proof for your false claims, will be a cold day in hell... You don't have proof, and you know it... You are defending a bird of a feather...predictable...
More of your self induced imaginations... ...more lies and inuendo, lacking any proof. At least you are consistent like so many others around here in your false claims... Repeat something false enough times, and the dimwitted actually believe it... Did you learn that from Goebbels?
I can't speak for Mom0/pH0x, but I learned that tactic from that Z10 asshole. You remember him, don't ya? LOL
So you "learned" something that you think is "right" and then practice it? Too absurd... A simple thank you would be more appropriate...
Oh you are welcome. Hopefully you will now learn to be logical... ...any idiot can be trained to act like a monkey, you have that down to a T. Now see if you can learn to reason to conclusion rather from conclusion...
Or watch a monkey fuck a football, like you admitted to earlier? Since I learned to repeat something false enough times, the dimwitted actually believe it, from you. Where am I supposed to learn "to reason to conclusion" from, cause it's certainly not you.