Another "Pro Lifer" kills...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, Jun 1, 2009.

  1. Who exactly is censoring you because of your political positions?



     
    #121     Jun 6, 2009
  2. A fetus is not a citizen.

    If you want to show me a US passport of a fetus, go ahead...

     
    #122     Jun 6, 2009
  3. No, it's a perfectly reasonable statement. You keep your government out of my bedroom, and you keep your government out of personal moral decisions.

    Great, then ban birth control, you know, to "save the citizens."

    Exactly -- you see this debate isn't about abortion at all, but extremism. Any extremist can justify any action to prevent "murder."
     
    #123     Jun 6, 2009
  4. How about keeping government out of the privacy of a doctor's office providing legal medical procedures...

     
    #124     Jun 6, 2009
  5. Because it's murder! MURDER!

    Umm... and we're also saying that vigilantes shouldn't do anything about this mass baby killing of innocent babies.
     
    #125     Jun 6, 2009
  6. stu

    stu

    yuk...honestly. ET should provide sick bags when you post.

    I am very much uneasy about abortion in general and I feel 22 weeks is just too far anyway. I have an overwhelming sense that humans should treat life as if it were inviolable.

    But constructing smarmy political speak, encouraging and excusing outrageous and misleading language or violence against those who do not share my views about it, calling it murder when it is not, linking it with arguments against homosexuals , playing the victim feigning lifers are being censored , expecting to be taken seriously by pleading a holy Christian self-righteousness on moral grounds for human life when at the same time you take the role of hypocritical religious apologist in condescending explanations why your Christian "Father" drowned all his own children, is never going help me crystallize my doubt to your way of thinking.
    I’m sure many don't like the whole abortion question too and wish your stupid fucking God had never made it a problem in the first place so putting that religion crap forward yet again as if it can answer anything is no idea at all.

    bigdavediode has given rational practical and reasonable argument for - in a strong defense of.
    It's time lifers treated the audience in similar manner and came up with some responsible dialogue and meaningful justification.
     
    #126     Jun 6, 2009
  7. jem

    jem

    you leftist idiots are so offended by the truth you start making up strawmen.

    When did I or anyone on this thread make the argument a fetus is a citizen?

    Go ahead be pro death? But tell the truth you are in favor of dismembering un born human beings crushing their brains and sucking out the parts with a vacuum.

    Have the guts to stop posing strawman.
     
    #127     Jun 6, 2009
  8. You wrote:

    "There is no more core value of a government than to protect its citizen's rights to exist."

    A fetus is not a citizen, it is not a human being, so any comment that followed the above that had to do with a fetus would be moot.

    That included any fetus that is not born...a fetus becomes a human being upon birth...not conception.

    Maybe you forgot, application for citizenship includes on the form a place to put date of birth...

    LOL!!!

    An unborn fetus, is not a citizen, nor does it have any rights of citizenship...

    Come on jem, face it, your entire position is based on your belief that human beings begin at conception, something that the law does not hold as true...

     
    #128     Jun 6, 2009
  9. The law has been wrong many, many times in the past.

    What is an organism that has a pulse and DNA of homo sapiens sapiens, if not human?

    It is tragic, really, that women can murder out of convenience.

    :(
     
    #129     Jun 6, 2009
  10. It's a Teri Schiavo.
     
    #130     Jun 6, 2009