though you said you were convinced, you do not appear to actually be convinced, so what can be done but ask for the facts that support your claim re the doctor. although this is a red herring, due to the fact that what is under discussion is mg++, the message was delivered by Dean, hell if she is satan himself, the science at this point in history shows that what she says holds up under scrutiny. As to her entire life work, not of particular interest at this juncture, what was covered in the that 5 minute blurb cued up in the vids contains information and if You can throw some shade on any of the statements made there, then specific facts pertinent to that bit of information Would be most excellent. Please bring citations with you, it aint like you gotta trudge across the frozen tundra to find info fred, hell it is a few keystrokes away. where are the facts to support your assertions? Yes a good diet is an excellent way to ensure proper nutrition to the mill. cheers
Why would I bother "throwing shade" on specifics claimed by a discredited doctor? She's a discredited doctor; that's all the shade that needs throwing. On top of which she is considered a quack because of her fanaticism about magnesium. And so, you want me, a layman, to dissect her "expert" assertions about magnesium?! I don't think so. Besides, I think you ended it quite succinctly: Nuff said. No argument there.