Well let me help you out. That chant is harassing to Hispanic people. Those kids were harassing the Hispanic kids. It’s obvious.
This POS above is more concerned with illegals feelings than people killed by terrorist. They have treasonous priorities and don't give a crap about American citizens.
I never said the confederate flag ad stereotyped anyone. Nor did I say the other ads stereotyped Hispanics. In fact, I said the opposite. YOU said that both ads stereotyped. That was the comment that started it all, and the one you cannot seem to justify despite pages and pages of trying.
It's not obvious to anyone looking at it from a balanced viewpoint. You are making assumption after assumption without any evidence at all. You have no idea why those kids chanted that, and you have no idea what, if any, feelings any Hispanics in school had from it. This is nothing more than typical "snowflake" behavior. One person feels "hurt" over another's comments. Except that you're channeling the hurt for a third party, which is ridiculous.
I want you to step back from the keyboard and look around your floor for your brain. When you find it, pick it up and put it back inside of your head.
Are you sure you found your brain and it wasn’t rock you put inside of your head? Look man, everything isn’t racist but you are arguing against blatant stereotyping in political ads. You are telling me those sanctuary city ads don’t stereotype non gang member Hispanics, they do. You are also telling me those kids in the cafeteria might as well have been singing kumbaya en espanol in that cafeteria. You want me to believe this all good old wholesome American behavior. But, it’s rwally not. It’s a sign of the times and the times are divided more than ever.
They don't stereotype non-gang member Hispanics. They might stereotype non-gang member illegal immigrants, but that's not the same thing. You are indicating it implies that all Hispanics, regardless of whether they are illegally here, citizens, legal aliens or whatever are criminals and that is simply not what the ad is saying. Not even remotely. Any claim that it is, is disingenuous at best, and total horseshit at worst. As for the kids in the cafeteria, I am saying that it could be something as innocent as cheering that Trump won, or it could be a direct affront to students right there. I am saying I don't know. You don't either, but are claiming you do know. I try to argue based on facts and proof. You argue based on conjecture.
Ok, I get it, you will deny anything to argue against there being any adverse impacts on minorities in politics. You would have made an excellent know nothing.
If requiring facts before making a decision on the matter means denying "anything", then guilty as charged. I think I've achieved what I set out to in this thread, however. You've been outed as a sock puppet with an agenda, not really all that interested in finding any common ground or discussion, but in advancing a narrative. Facts be damned.