2year newbie is using your strategy. Look at it this way. You have 15 streams to fill with picks. each pick makes 15% in 4 to 6 weeks. He is doing what you do. But DHI at 30.60 for stream 8. Sell it in less than 6 weeks at 35.19. Buy it again at 28.45 for stream 2. Sell it at 33.92 4 weeks later. Blah blah. now you have just bought it at 40.23 and you will hold it for as long as it takes to get 46.26 or so. You have to make a new pick for one of your 15 threads every other day to keep your strategy rolling. Why not use the same picks over and over as they go up?? Since DHI was picked you have been posting this and that. we do not see the next four or five you needed to do to keep your strategy performing since DHI. We know you are doing picks to keep things on schedule but you don't post them here for some reasons. 2 year newbie is using your strategy in disguise maybe. i have held a couple of your stocks in the last couple of months two. and it turns out i have twice recycled one of them as well. while you held for 15% I settled the first time for 13% and the second time for 14%. 2 year newbie is settling for about 50% on DHI it looks like. We both understand your strategy. 15 streams. Change out stock every 4 to 6 weeks with 15% profit. This is a pick every other day. 25 days is the average of 4 to 6 weeks. You divide 25 into a 250 day year. You cycle your streams 10 times a year. 1.15 raised to the 10th power is the compounding result. 4.05 is the answer. 405% capital gains per year. Neat. You do 15 picks every 25 days. That is 10 times 15 for the number of picks a year. So by mid November a year from now tyou will have picked 149 picks after DHI. This is a crude bunch is arithematic. You can easily see there is no provision for anything going wrong or slippage or stuff like that. 53 picks in a row is just about 1/3 of a year for your strategy. Four months of picks. Cool. Keep up the good work. All you have said here and to your new forum of 400 new members who came over from the older forum where you had 800 members are going to see some real wiggling and squirming in the next 12 months. Finally, you have given us your strategy and how great it is. I do 500 picks a year so your nailing down 150 ought to be pretty easy. I can see why funds are seeking you out. 400% a year is a cool return where it only takes 150 picks a year. That is a real performing strategy.
Maybe, but not because of any matter of wit here. Mr. Market doesn't have to mention any specific site, he referenced a site as being his, by writing "my site". That's good enough. There are other posts where he gives the URL to one of his sites at the time, it may or may not be that site that he's referencing now, but it's no matter. He identifies a site as being his, and that's all that counts; it could be any one of a zillion URLs of his. The point is that it's his site. So I don't see why the need to be coy and play 'I didn't say that' make-believe nonsense, except in the mistaken belief that one is artfully skirting the legalities. And I'll repeat this thought for new eyes reading this stuff for the first time. When you see a website that lists its membership number, keep in mind that the number includes past members who no longer frequent the site. It includes members who forgot their old account sign-in and have re-registered a second time or more. It certainly never signifies that each and every signup is proof of the success of the site's content, in this case, the stock picking ability of its founder. Could be curiosity that has driven signups, especially given Mr. Markets past constant stumping for his site. In truth, it's a bit of everything and not any one thing.
HAhahahaah 416 omg what a joke. There are a ton of free sites that incite more interest than that in a month. And they do it without bragging and bullshit lies. Who cares, they are all idiots anyway who do not understand what true investing is. I do not invest, I'm a trader. But when I do look for gains I look for 100% gains, not a measly 15%. I have already mentioned some picks in a previous thread you posted. I would never hold my losses like that when it comes to investing. And I would not base my strategy on constant capital infusions. And YTD, the indexes outperformed you. But forget indexes, there are so many stocks that have easily gained 50% YTD. I mean, even a highly promoted cult stock like EBAY has gained almost 50%. Why would anyone want your measly 15% gain strategy that requires constant capital infusions and hold on to losers. You know maybe if you lost that attitude and actually listen to what the posters have to say, your strategy could be turned around into a successful one. Right now, you require your day job to support your investing practices.
That criteria rules out most of the most succesful traders and people in the world. You may use it, as you often do, to dismiss the messenger, as that's your style, but it's not a basis for dismissing the accuracy of any message.
So why bother soliciting comments on ET if you place merit in posts by Wharton graduates and dismiss others on the basis that they did not attend Wharton?