The image problem is certain aspects of our population thinking they can act /be thugs without consequences.
Like I said before the election, please to continue to share these views. Encourage your politicians to share them as well.
There's a difference between making sure you're safe and firing into a car of unarmed teenagers 8 or 9 times. Let's see what the facts turn up.
Do you think you can go one day without tying something PT posts to the entire GOP? It's really getting old.
It's really all he's got. Gawd knows he can't trade, or he wouldn't be running from his own challenge screaming like a little girl.
He's FULL OF SHIT! The election boiled down to one thing and one thing only... (1) Ne'er do wells (takers) want the government to give them more freebies. (2) There are more "takers" than there are "makers". The "takers" WILL NOW WIN EVERY ELECTION AND DOMINATE POLICIAL POLICY ON "100% OF THE ISSUES" UNTIL THE COLLAPSE/REVOLUTION! Just this week Pravda had a news story stating "Obama is a Communist".... and that [paraphrasing], "...America fucked up voted for him... we were stupid (I say greedy, too) to have not learned from Russia's Communism experience..."
EXACTLY! Not much left to do now but raid the ships liqueur cabinet and watch the water line approach.
you don't get it do you? When you are protecting yourself you don't have time to do a 3 month investigation as to exactly what weapons they have or their intent.Besides being outnumbered 5-6 to one is justification for deadly force anyway all by itself if you've already seen a gun barrel.
"A Short History of Takers November 25, 2012, 3:15 pm "Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute is one of the unsung heroes of the recent election. His work claiming that we have become a nation of takers, reliant on the government to take care of us, helped define the tone and language with which Republicans talk to each other, especially when they donât think anyone else is listening; hence Romneyâs 47 percent remarks, and President Obamaâs road to reelection. Thanks! "Now, many people have pointed out that Eberstadtâs alleged evidence for the taker hypothesis is really mainly just saying that Medicare and Medicaid have gotten a lot more expensive. So Iâm doing prep work for classes next semester, and I thought Iâd just graph government transfer payments other than Medicare/Medicaid as a share of GDP. Hereâs what it looks like: <img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/11/25/opinion/112512krugman2/112512krugman2-blog480.jpg"> "So, as I read it, this number shoots up in recessions and their aftermath, then declines again, hitting a low during the later Clinton years; but thereâs really no trend since the early 70s. "Indeed: the taking thing is all about health care." - Paul Krugman