No, you refuse to believe that man is changing the climate at a historically unprecedented rate. We (meaning those of us with a brain and sanity) never said we think climate doesn't change. Of course it has it always changed. It's the rate of change that's the problem.
Alarmists will just be alarmists. They are a dying breed and extreme fools. More accurate and less manipulated Satellite Temperature data. <img src=http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/uah_august2008.png width=460 height=246>
You are a lying scumbag repeating lies and distortions. 94 % of the heat on earth is in it's oceans. The oceans are a far better judge of the global temps. But you are too fucking stupid and too much of a liar to know that. Why do you lie so much? Are you compensated by the site owners to pump up views?
AS I have said FC, I admire your tenacity to fight this fight. But the war has already been won. The people that matter are already convinced. Here is more evidence: NYC Lays Out $20 Billion Plan to Adapt to Climate Change http://www.cnbc.com/id/100808071
This is the only topic you post about, asshole. That makes you a probable paid schill! You should go find some site that agrees with your nonsense. We know better here. Here the truth prevails instead of the lies and nonsense you post. You are just a fucking fool, futurecunt. Get lost, asshole, brotherfucker. <font size=4 color=blue><b>The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.</b> ~ Ronald Reagan</font>
You did not answer my question. If you continue to avoid the question I will assume you are in fact compensated to pump up views.
Assume what ever you like. You do it all the time and wind up with incorrect conclusions. The truth is we all know you are paid to pump AGW lies here. It's obvious that you are just an ignorant paid schill.
OK then. You are being compensated to stir the pot. That makes sense. Why else would you continue to lie and be so stupid. I am acting out of a sense of civic reponsibility and am not being compensated to post here.
what an... an 11 year moving average? since when have we been looking at 11 year moving averages ending in 2010. That is once deceptive look you go there. I reference no statistically discernable warming the last 17 years... which roughly matches up with the previous warming period and counters the IPCC model projections. pspr just showed you a chart of temperatures. see... it plateaued and is going down.