Andy's Day and Position Trading Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Jordan_Andy, Jul 26, 2004.

  1. saviola

    saviola

    Hi Andy

    Been reading your journal and think its great, glad to see you are going back to trading larger timeframes, i personally find that RH and 123's are much better on a larger timeframe.

    Good luck with your trades.
    SAV
     
    #331     May 2, 2005
  2. Hi Fred,

    I am not doing so much back testing so far. I am starting now to find out how to use backtesting software.

    For the 123's and RH's I do not need so much back testing I guess but for the new strategies I want to test it makes definitely sense.

    How much data do you need? Well, I guess it really depends on the time frame you are trading because (as you said already) markets are changing very often. I guess on a 60 min strategy you should look over the last 6 - 12 month but you should also test your strategy on paper. Sometimes it looks nice in the computer but terrible when you start trading it.

    happy trading

    Andy
     
    #332     May 3, 2005
  3. Markus

    Markus

    There are a few factors that you need to consider when determining the period for backtesting your trading system:
    • Trade frequency
      How many trades per day does your trading system generate? It’s not important how long you backtest a trading system; it’s important that you receive enough trades to make statistically valid assumptions (see below). If your trading system generates three trades per day, i.e. 600 trades per year, then a year of testing gives you enough data to make reliable assumptions. But if your trading system generates only three trades per month, i.e. 36 trades per year, then you should backtest a couple of years to receive reliable data.
    • Underlying contract
      You must consider the characteristics of the underlying contract. The chart below shows the average daily volume of the e-mini S&P:
      [​IMG]
      It doesn’t make sense to backtest a trading system for the e-mini S&P before 1999, because the contract simply didn't exist! In my opinion it doesn't make sense to backtest an e-mini trading system before 2002 because at that time the market was completely different; less liquidity and different market participants. I believe that a reliable testing period for the e-mini S&P are the years 2002 – 2004.

    What is "statistically valid"?
    Recently I received an article from a Ph.D in Statistics. He explained the correlation between the sample size and the "margin of error" in the table below. The bigger the sample is the smaller the margin of error, but usually a sample date of 200 trades should be sufficient. If your trading system generates enough trades, then you should use 500 - 600 trades.

    [​IMG]

    Just my two cents. :)

    Markus
     
    #333     May 3, 2005
  4. FredBloggs

    FredBloggs Guest

    thanks for the reply andy & markus.

    i dont use back testing software, just scroll back the chart by hand

    :eek:

    a bit cumbersome, but due to the set ups i use - like hooks, i think it would be awkward to program, as many of them are a bit subjective.

    thanks
     
    #334     May 3, 2005
  5. Today’s Day Trading – 05/04

    Euro FX 60 minutes: 10:20am – Short TTE (RH) at 12950, stop/first target 10 ticks – all out at b/e.

    Results of today: +0 ticks (+$0) 1 trade

    Here are the results for this month:

    May:
    Euro FX: -12 ticks (-$150) 3 trades
    Mini Russell: +0 ticks (+$0) 1 trade

    To be consistent with my recordings I add my monthly summary (hypothetical result due to 2 contracts):

    April:
    Euro FX: +0 ticks (+0) 19 trades
    Mini Dow: -40 ticks (-$200) 15 trade
    Mini Russell: +8 ticks (+$80) 12 trades
    Mini Russell new method: +48 ticks (+$480) 5 trades

    March:
    Euro FX: +38 ticks (+$475) 32 trades
    Mini Dow: -20 ticks (-$100) 4 trades
    Mini Russell: +12 ticks (+$120) 7 trades

    February:
    Euro FX: +103 ticks (+$1362.50) 37 trades
    Mini Dow: -10 ticks (-$50) 13 trades
    Mini Russell: +55 ticks (+$550) 12 trades

    January:
    Euro FX: +76 ticks (+$950) 23 trades
    Mini Dow: -46 ticks (-$230) 9 trades
    Mini Russell: +120 ticks (+$120) 3 trades
     
    #335     May 4, 2005
  6. Today’s Day Trading – 05/05

    Not feeling well today...no trades!
     
    #336     May 5, 2005
  7. Today’s Day Trading – 05/06

    Euro FX 60 minutes: 9:20am – Short TTE (RH) at 12850, stop/first target 10 ticks – covered first lot at 12840, second at b/e.

    Euro FX 10 minutes: 8:00am – Short TTE (RH) at 12869, stop/first target 6 ticks – all out at 12872 (time stop).

    Results of today: +4 ticks (+$20) 2 trades

    Here are the results for this month:

    May:
    Euro FX: -8 ticks (-$100) 5 trades
    Mini Russell: +0 ticks (+$0) 1 trade

    To be consistent with my recordings I add my monthly summary (hypothetical result due to 2 contracts):

    April:
    Euro FX: +0 ticks (+0) 19 trades
    Mini Dow: -40 ticks (-$200) 15 trade
    Mini Russell: +8 ticks (+$80) 12 trades
    Mini Russell new method: +48 ticks (+$480) 5 trades

    March:
    Euro FX: +38 ticks (+$475) 32 trades
    Mini Dow: -20 ticks (-$100) 4 trades
    Mini Russell: +12 ticks (+$120) 7 trades

    February:
    Euro FX: +103 ticks (+$1362.50) 37 trades
    Mini Dow: -10 ticks (-$50) 13 trades
    Mini Russell: +55 ticks (+$550) 12 trades

    January:
    Euro FX: +76 ticks (+$950) 23 trades
    Mini Dow: -46 ticks (-$230) 9 trades
    Mini Russell: +120 ticks (+$120) 3 trades
     
    #337     May 6, 2005
  8. What happened to the new method? Did you say you weren't doing it?
     
    #338     May 6, 2005
  9. Forget about it Chris...doesn't work!

    Andy
     
    #339     May 6, 2005
  10. Lol ok cool.
     
    #340     May 6, 2005