Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, Feb 10, 2011.

  1. jem

    jem

    [/QUOTE]

    That is some seriously good and persuasive writing.
    Can I hire you for creating material for my real estate websits?

    I already have some good spots on google but I think you could help me kill it by starting a community with legal questions and answers and writing about current events banksters and housing values.
     
    #891     Apr 8, 2011
  2. Ricter

    Ricter


    Problem is, paragraph 7 is flawed.
     
    #892     Apr 8, 2011
  3. Okay LongShot Jr.

    Show the flaw...

     
    #893     Apr 8, 2011
  4. stu

    stu

    Along with 8 others.
     
    #894     Apr 10, 2011
  5. stu

    stu

    How sweet the song of nonsense sounds in a creationist's ear.
     
    #895     Apr 10, 2011
  6. jem

    jem

    Stu here is your quote... and you have stated it in other places.

    Stu is denying he every said this on another thread.
    Every few weeks he tries to pretend there is proof of life coming from non life... then when we present the science he denies he said it and makes up similar lies to the ones above.
     
    #896     Aug 14, 2011
  7. stu

    stu

    I do seriously wonder if all your chairs are at home Jem.

    I say this ....."There is plenty of science showing life from non life."

    It is obvious to anyone who cares to look how that is quite true. There’s no pretence No mention of proof of life from non life… even though there is proof of how life’s essential components do arise naturally from inorganic matter.

    So you say, I said this....." he tries to pretend there is proof of life coming from non life... "

    You do that to everything don't you? Words and meaning must change as they pass through that creationist filter between your ears because you just don’t want to understand the reality.

    It's incredible what religious delusion must have done to your ability to think straight.

    And who is this "we" presenting science?
    Just be careful is all I advise. You've shown many worrying signs of having a split personality with all that weird screen name business on quite a few previous occasions. Now this.

    "We" don't want any more of that unhealthy kind of thing now do "we"?
     
    #897     Aug 14, 2011
  8. How is an omnipresent infinitely powerful god instantly coming fully formed from nothing or always being here with no beginning easier to believe than evolution ?
     
    #898     Aug 14, 2011
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    It's not, one is about as plausible as the other to me.
     
    #899     Aug 14, 2011
  10. You're an atheist like me except you don't understand science.
     
    #900     Aug 14, 2011