Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, Feb 10, 2011.

  1. stu

    stu

    Confirming once more that it is not reasoned argument but peevish whinges, uniformed conclusions, willfull ignorance, denial and misinformation at the core of intelligent design creationism.....


     
    #841     Apr 4, 2011
  2. It would be nice for a change to see you do something more than just prattle about an argument being "not reasoned, peevish whinges, uninformed conclusions, willful ignorance, denial and misinformation."

    Your only rebuttal these days is to blather like Glenn Beck...

     
    #842     Apr 4, 2011
  3. stu

    stu

    Obviously it wasn't "nice" as you kept up the unreasoned peevish whinges regardlessly.

    Godunnit is no argument and when you think like Glen Beck, rebuttal would seem like blather.
     
    #843     Apr 4, 2011
  4. jem

    jem

    Notice stu refuses to address the science and the point... so once again I will let the elegance stand...


     
    #844     Apr 4, 2011
  5. "Obviously it wasn't "nice" as you kept up the unreasoned peevish whinges regardlessly."

    Oh, it is nice to see you dodge critiques of abiogenesis.

    Shows that you are not scientific at all. Being faithful in what scientists say, is actually not terribly scientific.


     
    #845     Apr 4, 2011
  6. Stu will become more and more emotional as it is clear that he cannot defend his own position logically or scientifically.

    It happens whenever someone's core beliefs are challenged. stu's world will come crashing down if the truth that the foundation of his beliefs are unproved and unprovable, so he has to stay in denial and come out swinging.

    Desperately he want to appear reasonable and not faithful, when the reality is that his faith is not much different than anyone else.

    Guesses of science have nothing at all to do with scientific proofs or evidence.

    Science and atheism are stu's religion, without question.

     
    #846     Apr 4, 2011
  7. stu

    stu

    I address them , you ignore them, just so you can say I refuse to address them.

    That's what creationists do.
     
    #847     Apr 5, 2011
  8. stu

    stu

    And what you call 'critiques of abiogenesis' are no such thing. They are willfully ignorant remarks made by ID creationists.

    "The whole notion of abiogenesis is a construction built by evolutionists so that they can dismiss the whole notion of God from the generation of life."

    So if it doesn't have God in , evolution and science is nothing but a conspiracy against religion.
    What a hopelessly idiotic opening line.
    Another creationist whose only argument for intelligent design is to repeat the phrase... science is wrong.

    It's revealing how you find that kind of thing "nice"
     
    #848     Apr 5, 2011
  9. stu

    stu

    .....dream on.
     
    #849     Apr 5, 2011
  10. You ignore them, just so you can refuse to address them.

    That's what atheists do.

     
    #850     Apr 5, 2011