An Obama Spending Spree? Hardly

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Free Thinker, May 23, 2012.

  1. Max E.

    Max E.

    I dont think he knows the difference between Omnibus spending bill, stimulus and TARP, thats the only conclusion i can come to at this point that would piece together his fatuous nonsense....

     
    #171     May 27, 2012
  2. Additoinal for FY 2009 OUTLAYS, that is actual spending increase.

    I have showed you again and again along with the Mises article that the appropriations made in 2009 were not all part of the Fy 09 spending. You know perfectly what I meant when I said that it takes time between appropriations and the actual spending. Even Nutting in his analysis included this increased spending if you actually notice.

    To repeat - just because the bill was SIGNED DURING FY 09, doesn't mean that the spending is part of the FY 09 SPENDING.
     
    #172     May 27, 2012
  3. Do explain the projected budget deficit of 1.2 trillion by the CBO in January and the actual budget deficit of 1.4 trillion which was 200 billion higher. If there was extra spending of 400 billion with omnibus and 140 billion with the stimulus, why wasn't the deficit higher.
     
    #173     May 27, 2012
  4. Max E.

    Max E.

    Surely you cant be this fucking stupid? YOUR OWN FUCKING ARTICLE SAYS THAT FROM 2012-2021 (9 YEARS) OBAMACARE WILL ADD A TRILLION TO THE DEFICIT.

     
    #174     May 27, 2012
  5. No it doesn't you moron, it talks about the costs and how it would add to the deficit AND then talks about the OFFSETS that shows that it will DECREASE deficits. You are ONLY looking at COSTS without the OFFSETS to make your bullshit claim.

    You saw the word deficits and stopped reading. This is the part that you skipped

    But those increases were more than offset by a reduction of:

    Also, just to point out the very very obvious, the CBO report is ONLY about the insurance provisions of ACA and not the entirety of the law.

    CBO and JCT have previously estimated that the ACA will, on net, reduce budget deficits over the 2012-2021 period; that estimate of the overall budgetary impact of the ACA has not been updated.
     
    #175     May 27, 2012
  6. Max E.

    Max E.

    You are honestly dumber than fucking dirt, read your own goddamn article, and pay attention, and read it closely, if you are too stupid to interpret what this article actually says, you need to go back to kindergarten.

    I amn done with you, no more beating my head against a wall with someone who is illiterate. Congratulations, you are only the second person on this site who is so reprehensible that you warrant the use of the ignore feature.
     
    #176     May 27, 2012
  7. Really? Did you even the TITLE of the CBO article?

    What does it say?

    "CBO Releases Updated Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act"

    It's ONLY talking about certain provisions of the ACA and not the entire ACT. It is also showing that the those provisions will have LOWER COSTS than estimated earlier.

    It is NOT talking about Obamacare in it's entirety.

    Read this again and again till it sinks in.

    CBO and JCT have previously estimated that the ACA will, on net, reduce budget deficits over the 2012-2021 period; that estimate of the overall budgetary impact of the ACA has not been updated.


    This must be really embarassing for you which is why you are running away from your laugable claim! You said you worked with this kind of stuff and yet here you are reading the entire CBO report incorrectly.
     
    #177     May 27, 2012
  8. Mav88

    Mav88

    You didn't show that you dumbass, and the bill in question, the 2009 Omnibus bill was all partt of FY2009. What you can't seem to get into you little stupid noodle is the fact that money from FY2009 can be expended during FY2010 and it is still part of the FY2009 budget.

    I know perfectly well you are full of misconception when it comes to comprehension, I have shown it.

    for the omnibus bill- yes it does you fucking dumbass
     
    #178     May 27, 2012
  9. So now you are 'expending' what I said and not reply to what I actually said!

    So I ask again, do explain the projected budget deficit of 1.2 trillion by the CBO in January 2009 and the actual budget deficit of 1.4 trillion which was 200 billion higher. If there was extra spending of 400 billion with omnibus and 140 billion with the stimulus, why wasn't the deficit higher.
     
    #179     May 27, 2012
  10. Mav88

    Mav88

    I did reply you stupid jackass, you just can't grasp it.

    I'm starting to think that you are just some twat who only wants to argue to irritate, it's the only way to explain such willfull stupidity.

    I'm done with that, I think Max has had his fill as well
     
    #180     May 27, 2012