An Interview with Dick Lindzen

Discussion in 'Politics' started by piezoe, Sep 23, 2014.

  1. ha ha ha LOLWUWT !! c3headlines !!! Why not use a random poster on Yahoo? Why oh why can't you use authoritative sources like NASA and NOAA? Every single source and scientist you use are frauds,fools or paid for by the fossil fuel interests. Every one. You should be ashamed of yourself.


     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2014
    #91     Sep 28, 2014
  2. fhl

    fhl

  3. jem

    jem

    fraudc you troll .. that is a graph of the results from the noaa datasets and other top data sets.
    who cares where the charts comes from... its an accurate reproduction of the climate data scientists use.

    But of course you would not know that since you don't read science.


     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2014
    #93     Sep 28, 2014
  4. [​IMG]
    The Oceans Warmed up Sharply in 2013: We're Going to Need a Bigger Graph
    Posted on 31 January 2014 by Rob Painting

    Because the oceans cover some 71% of the Earth's surface and are capable of retainingheat around a thousand times that of the atmosphere, the oceans are where most of the energy from global warming is going - 93.4% over recent decades. So greenhouse gases emitted by human industrial activity not only cause more heat to become trapped in theatmosphere, they also cause more of the sun's energy to accumulate in the oceans.

    Long-term the oceans have been gaining heat at a rate equivalent to about 2 Hiroshima bombs per second, although this has increased over the last 16 or so years to around 4 per second. In 2013 ocean warming rapidly escalated, rising to a rate in excess of 12 Hiroshima bombs per second - over three times the recent trend. This doesn't necessarily mean we are entering a period of greatly accelerated ocean warming, as there is substantial year-to-year variation in heat uptake by the oceans. It does, however, once again dispel the persistent myth of a pause in global warming, because the Earth has actually continued to warm faster in the last 16 years than it did in the preceding 16 years.
     
    #94     Sep 28, 2014
  5. jerm will you ever quote a legitimate source on the science on man made global warming? Or is it too hard to spread your lies that way?
     
    #95     Sep 28, 2014
  6. jem

    jem

    fraudcurrents... you must be happy that you install a/c for a living and we have determined there is no warming outside of natural variability and there is no science showing man made co2 causes warming anyway.


    you can go to work with a clear conscience.
    you can thank those of us here who care about science enough to read it.
     
    #96     Sep 29, 2014
  7. you can thank those of us here who care about science enough to read it. we have determined there is no warming outside of natural variability and there is no science showing man made co2 causes warming anyway.

    American Meteorological Society
    "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
     
    #97     Sep 29, 2014
  8. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    There's that "we" again, the ignorant who live in a closed loop of denial.
     
    #98     Sep 29, 2014
  9. jem

    jem

    closed loop... fraudcurrents and you are living and dying on a hockey stick graph that has not been updated with the the dozen or so studies that have come out since 2005... showing that the Midieval Warm Period was warmer than today.

    Nor are you agw nutters looking at the science NASA produced showing CO2 also causes cooling in the atmospshere...

    the people in the loop of ignorance are you.

    If you wish to show otherwise..
    produce some science showing man made co2 causes warming.

    go ahead... post your best info... right now.
     
    #99     Sep 29, 2014
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    #100     Sep 29, 2014