It appears that you have nothing to say about the fact that the term sexual assault appears dozens of times in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. The best you can do is re-direct with insults and cartoons.
Oh Kellyanne or is it furious George? You have now flung your poop "assault" across two threads. Here is proof, no, here it his, try this.. aping the re-framing you see on TV with Kellyanne. I am trading now, if I have time to waste later... but like the clip below explained for a child to understand. You might learn something. Not that I want you to get even better at what you do already but so 'they' can see your game.
Obviously you still have not searched for the word "assault" in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. Go fling your poop somewhere else...
Every one of those keywords there DENY assault took place, you were asked to find where assault actually happened, not tell us what didn't happen. If the documents had murder in it, you would be accusing Clintons of murder.
Nobody asked about the TERM appearing there, what was asked is that the actions be characterized as assault by authorities which it was not.
Dude it would take you all day to point out all the times Groper was wrong in the last 2 years. Definitely do it!