Yup, Trump DOJ have dropped the criminal investigation. Oh wait! I am not a right winger to have just one issue to harp about.
Go read the other thread for more specifics. The problem is that you never go read any of the links people post and then claim the other people are liars. In this instance the wikipedia links includes links to the actual lawsuits filed against Bill Clinton. Either you can go read them or once again remain willfully ignorant.
There we go again with your standard evasion 'go read something else which doesn't exist'. There is no thread, you got nothing which is why you can't post a single link where Clinton was accused of sexual assault in courts. This is why you can't post anything and instead resort to insults.
I responded to your comment in the other thread regarding Clinton';s sexual assaults and the courts. I will re-post the same thing again here since you are deliberately being thick. Here is the other post for your reference -- so you won't claim it does not exist... https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-arrested-for-rape.313789/page-3#post-4526157 Here is the text of the post. Read it and be educated... Let's just start with Paula Jones -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations#Paula_Jones "In any case, in 1994, Jones filed a federal lawsuit against Clinton, alleging sexual harassment. In the discovery stage of the suit, Jones's lawyers had the opportunity to question Clinton under oath about his sexual history; in the course of this testimony, Clinton denied having had a sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky, a denial that (once his affair with Lewinsky was exposed) would lead to his impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice.[9] Then we can move on to Paul Corbyn Jones... "Paula Corbyn Jones accuses Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting her in 1991. After she tried to walk away from his initial advances, according to her story, he grabbed her hand, pulled her toward him, lowered his trousers, and asked her to kiss his erect penis. Clinton paid Jones an $850,000 settlement after the US Supreme Court reinstated her lawsuit against him during his Presidency. Jones continues to speak out against both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, whom she accuses of shaming and lying about her." https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/1...ll-clinton-or-donald-trump-of-sexual-assault/
Who are you kidding with your bullshit. You link to the wikipedia page which talks about Paula Jones and says she accused him of exposing his dick which is of course not sexual ASSAULT but being the disingenuous con you are, you link to another link by some propaganda rag that makes up it's own story changing it to 'Paula jones accused Clinton of sexual assault' which is outright false. You think nobody would notice your gish gallop of posting two different links and pretending they are talking about the same thing? It's not my first time dealing with lying Cons, a Con lies when there is no need to, that's the difference between Cons and Liberals.
Live your fantasy... I provided two links that go over the material; wikipedia and counterpunch. Reasonable people can go over the material and clearly see that Paul Corbyn Jones sued Bill Clinton for sexual assault and that Paula Jones sued Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. You asked for one example of Bill Clinton being sued for sexual harassment - I provided one.
So your own wiki page link is a fantasy now? You posted two links because the first link didn't back up your assertions, so you posted a second fake news link to beef up your non existent assault claims. Neither in the wiki link or the court documents has Paula Jones ever accused Clinton of sexual assault or feel free to quote it. You quote a fake news page because as a right winger, sources don't matter, only narrative does. And I didn't ask for one example of Clinton being sued for harassment, I asked about sexual assault- harassment is AGAIN not sexual assault. Can you even read??????
Yet you ignored the Wikipedia link to the Clinton vs. Jones lawsuit. Here it is again so you don't remain willfully ignorant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._Jones