ANTIFA = Brown Shirts Ben Stein Calls Mitch McConnell Confrontation ‘Disgusting’: It’s Like Brown Shirts in Early Nazi Days https://www.mediaite.com/tv/ben-ste...ing-its-like-brown-shirts-in-early-nazi-days/ TMZ caught up with Ben Stein on Saturday and asked him to weigh in on Mitch McConnell being confronted in a restaurant in Kentucky. Stein said the whole thing was “disgusting.” “Disgusting…mob rule,” Stein began. “Antifa is becoming like the brown shirts in the early days of the Nazi Party.” He added that he considered the confrontation “as close to violence as I want to get.” Then, when asked by the TMZ reporter if the confrontation actually amounted to democracy at work, Stein was adamant it was not. “No..no..no,” Stein said. “Democracy in action is voting.” On Friday, McConnell and his wife Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao were dining in Louisville when a group of men approached them. “Why don’t you get out of here? Why don’t you leave the entire country?” one man yelled. The senator’s to-go box was also thrown out the door.
Hillary the Hypocrite Hillary Clinton today: "It's a time of deep divisions and we have to do everything we can to bring our country together." Hillary 2 weeks ago: "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.”
Do I think it's hypocritical, yes. But that is exactly what we need at the moment from both sides. De-escalation.
Supreme Court accepts case of Maryland war memorial shaped like cross By Elizabeth Zwirz | Fox News Facebook Twitter Flipboard Comments Print Email The case regarding whether or not a Maryland war memorial in the shape of a cross goes against the separation of church and state was accepted for final review by Supreme Court justices on Friday. (Algerina Perna /The Baltimore Sun via AP, File) The case regarding whether or not a Maryland war memorial in the shape of a cross goes against a separation of church and state was accepted for final review by Supreme Court justices on Friday. The controversial memorial, which stands in Bladensburg, Maryland, was previously deemed to be in violation of the Constitution by a federal appeals court in Virginia, who determined that it “has the primary effect of endorsing religion and excessively entangles the government in religion.” In petitioning the nation’s highest court to take the case, Maryland officials who maintain the monument, otherwise known as the “Peace Cross,” insisted that what it’s meant to honor proves that its purpose is to portray a secular message of remembrance, not one of religion. Should the appeals court’s decision be allowed to stand, it could potentially affect hundreds of similar monuments across the country and would force “the removal or dismemberment of a cherished war memorial that has served as a site of solemn commemoration and civic unity for nearly a century,” the officials said. –– ADVERTISEMENT –– APPEALS COURT DENIES BID TO RECONSIDER RULING ON PEACE CROSS The cross, finished in 1925, was erected in remembrance of 49 local men who died in World War I. A plaque on the cross' base lists the names of those soldiers, and both faces of the cross have a circle with the symbol of the American Legion, the veterans organization that helped raise money to build it. The memorial’s location is roughly five miles from the Supreme Court. Those in favor of the statue argued that earlier Supreme Court rulings determined that monuments, particularly longstanding ones, which incorporate religious symbolism to send a secular message did not go against the Constitution. The shape of the “Peace Cross,” which they maintain falls into that category, was picked as a means to bear a likeness to cross-shaped grave markers used for soldiers buried in American cemeteries overseas, supporters said. STATUE OF REVOLUTIONARY WAR GENERAL GIVEN GOOGLY EYES BY PRANKSTER The American Humanist Association, the group against the memorial who, along with three local residents, filed a 2014 lawsuit against Maryland officials, argue that the symbol "discriminates against patriotic soldiers who are not Christian, sending a callous message to non-Christians that Christians are worthy of veneration while they may as well be forgotten." The organization attempted to persuade the Supreme Court against hearing the case, arguing that the appeals court's ruling is specific to the Bladensburg memorial and doesn't threaten any other monuments. Arguments for the case are expected to be heard in early 2019. Fox News’ Bill Mears and The Associated Press contributed to this report.