American Bankers Ask for Protection from Naked Shorting........

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by flytiger, Jul 19, 2008.

    U.S. banks ask SEC to expand stock trade protection
    Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:46pm EDT
    By John Poirier

    WASHINGTON, July 19 (Reuters) - An emergency move by U.S. securities regulators this week aimed at curbing manipulative short-selling in some major financial firms should be expanded to all publicly traded banks, or it could erode confidence in the banking industry, a top trade group said.

    A letter from the American Bankers Association to the Securities and Exchange Commission this week stressed that banks could be vulnerable as they are suffering from the financial turmoil stemming from the downturn in the U.S housing market.

    "The emergency order could further exacerbate a loss of confidence in the safety and soundness of this country's banking industry," ABA President Ed Yingling said in a Thursday letter to the SEC.

    "As the commission is aware, it would be an understatement to say that short interest in financial services companies has greatly increased over the year," Yingling said.

    On Friday the SEC, the U.S. markets watchdog, amended its action from earlier in the week but limited the protection to 19 firms including U.S. housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac whose shares plunged on concerns they were undercapitalized.

    The rule also applies to the stocks of 17 Wall Street firms, primary dealers that have access to the Federal Reserve's discount window, such as Citigroup Inc (C.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and Lehman Brothers (LEH.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz).

    Short selling is a legitimate strategy where the investor arranges to borrow shares they consider overvalued and sell them in hopes of profiting when the price drops. A naked short occurs when an investor sells stock that has not yet been borrowed.

    Wall Street, which was thrown off guard when the SEC announced the emergency rule on Tuesday, and U.S. stock exchanges applauded the rule modifications and guidance. But the ABA wanted the SEC protection expanded to all banks and their holding companies that are publicly traded.

    The emergency rule is the latest effort by the SEC to crack down on market manipulation. The agency has already announced plans to rein in those that are spreading false information amid complaints from companies and lawmakers that short sellers are driving down financial stocks.

    The ABA said the majority of the 8,500 banks in the United States are well-capitalized and capital levels are not affected by their stock prices. However, it said people with bank accounts might equate stock drops with the safety of their deposits.

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp insures up to $100,000 per deposit and up to $250,000 per retirement account at insured banks.

    The bank industry group said naked short selling has contributed to the increase in shorting of bank stocks.
  2. The bank industry group said naked short selling has contributed to the increase in shorting of bank stocks.


    This is great news. Soon naked shorting will be shown to cause cancer in rats.
  3. The Plunge Protection Team is broke.
  4. why is everyone so surprised about this? dont you remember the tech stock boom when the RPT (rally protection team) was put in place to supress overly exhuberant stocks? and naked leveraged longing got legislated out of existence? the banks were very vocal then as well about giving back some of the billions they made ipo'ing such great concepts as onlined delivered lava lamps, and online pet hotmail. These guys are such pussies. Their stocks are in the tank because or reckless fiscal abandon. Lending people with no credit rating, who have no assets, a half million to buy a house with 50k cash back? How can they blame shortsellers for their woes? Truly discgusting...
  5. Eliminating short selling will be the new "bubble" of course we need to modify a few accounting rules so we can catch up with the rest of the world.
  6. They aren't blaming shortsellers. They are blaming 'naked short sellers'. BKUNA is a prime example. They could have raised 400mm and maybe made it, until they said they wanted to raise 400mm. Then, they went to .65. Capitalism at its best.