Almost confirmed (IMPORTANT)

Discussion in 'Politics' started by WAEL012000, Jun 30, 2005.

  1. and we all know how reliable the arab news networks are.
     
    #51     Oct 24, 2005
  2. Yeah...I exactly know what you mean sputdr!!

    Like how a the psychological unite who arrived at Saddam Husains statue succeeded in collecting 60-70 Iraqis to gather around the statue before toppling it infront of the American media cameras to create the lie of overwhelming support for the occupation.

    Or how about how the American lying machine created this new saving Privet "Lynch" video!

    Or how the NBC fired Jon Alpert when he tried to show the real effect of the so called smart bombs that hit more civilian targets than the intended ones.

    Or how about the CBC director who was fired after daring to promise such reporter to air the tape.

    Or how out of the 37 independent reporters, 10 were killed by American forces.

    Or how the country (Spain) of one of these killed reporters is going to charge 3 American soldiers with war crimes.

    Or how the BBC's Kate Adie openly said the Pentagon c.s. was out to kill 'un american' journalists, and gave an interview concerning those 'friendly fire' killings of her colleagues.


    But then again...what do I know! I am only an Arab propagandist!!
     
    #52     Oct 24, 2005
  3. WAEL, yes the spanish socialist gov't is charging 3 US soldiers. This is exactly why the US will NEVER join the int'l crimes court.

    Do they plan to charge the French and Pakistani soldiers who are raping and forcing young african girls into prostitution?

    Are they going to charge the UN as a whole for being responsible for these soldiers?

    Will they charge the Canadians for their behavior in Yugoslavia?

    The answer is no. So whatever spain does is meaningless and the 3 soldiers will never be sent to spain and their show of moral superiority will be brushed off like a knat on a cow's scrotum.



     
    #53     Oct 25, 2005
  4. For illustration purposes the spanish gov't is the cow's scrotum.





     
    #54     Oct 25, 2005
  5. TGregg

    TGregg

    Six months later, and Wally's "confirmed" story is . . . well. . . Wallyspeak. I'm not proud of all this, pointing out oblivious idiocy is kinda embarrassing. Sadly, there are two or three folks who take this lunatic seriously, and it's essential to their recovery that complete and utter frauds be exposed.

    One hopes that Wally will eventually seek professional help, and recover, while the few tinfoil hat supporters come to their senses.

    One wonders if he'll accuse me of making this whole thread up under his alias. Or maybe he'll just say I re-edited it.
     
    #55     Jan 1, 2006
  6. TGregg

    TGregg

    I'm right here Wally. Pointing out how you are wrong yet again.
     
    #56     Jan 1, 2006
  7. #57     Jan 1, 2006
  8. TGregg

    TGregg

    And there you have it folks, poor ol Wally wrong and refusing to admit it. Been 9 months (and three elections) since we were about to pull out of Iraq, even CONFIRMED and IMPORTANT according to Al-Jizm and brain-dead knuckleheads who listen and believe propaganda from the same folks who said Iraq was winning when we invaded. Geez, how stupid can you be? Did you know that gullible is not in the dictionary?

    There's nobody more wrong than a liberal. Now where's that silly thread about the US invading Argentina at any moment?
     
    #58     Mar 24, 2006
  9. TGregg

    TGregg

    Now you know it's not true.
     
    #59     Mar 24, 2006
  10. TGregg

    TGregg

    So it's many months later (nearly a year after the original lie was posted), and clear to everybody that Wally is wrong "big time". Good thing he ran away with his tail between his legs to where the rest of the scum sucking losers are.

    Bowhwhwhwhwhw! ROFLMAO! What a moron! But clearly the smartest these jokers have to offer.

    That's what happens when one agrees with raghead propaganda. Most folks noticed that when Al Jizm said the US was about to get wiped out in the Iraq invasion and then they won, well maybe that shows the news channel to be more about hopes and dreams than facts. But if you're whole life is hopes and dreams against facts, that's not an easy thing to see.
     
    #60     May 5, 2006