Alex Jones Rips Piers Morgan a new one!

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by achilles28, Jan 8, 2013.

  1. Beautiful video...

    Alex hits about 50 points the cowards in mainstream media NEVER discuss.

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_XZvMwcluEg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  2. Wallet

    Wallet

    Alex speaks the truth, but his rant takes away from the message.
     
  3. On the contrary, that's exactly what America needs to hear.

    The media constantly browbeat viewers to engage in "civilized discourse" while they ruthlessly vilify and bully opponents who don't cave to their agenda. Fuck them and the horse they road in on.

    America is going down the shithole quick, thanks in large part to these Gatekeepers in media, like Piers Morgan, who push their anti-Constitution garbage and ignore the massive police state hastily building up all around us. Mainstream news is 95% agenda-driven crap.

    Piers is one of the biggest bullies on cable, and Alex stood up and put that fucker in his place. YOU AIN"T GETTING OUR GUNS!!!

    AMERICA NEEDS TO HEAR THAT

    America needs to see people go on these pussy-ass shows and DEMAND THEIR FUCKING RIGHTS> WE NEED TO FIND OUR BACKBONE AGAIN AND STOP TAKING THIS SHIT SITTING DOWN!

    Alex did a fine job!
     
  4. Got to say i agree with you on this one, if he hadnt come across as a raving lunatic, it would have been a lot better.
     
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I can see where both sides are coming from. On the one hand the presentation of our message is important. On the other hand we've been sitting on our collective ass letting these anti gun pussies erode our rights for decades. It's time to stand up and say "fuck no, not anymore!"
     
  6. You fell for it Max.

    That's exactly the mind game they play. The media vilify emotionally-charged people as "lunatics".

    They want us all to sit around a table, and control us with "proper decorum" and politically correct language, while we're about 3 years out from Greece and the gun grabbers are making a run for it.

    Listen, more people need to go on these shows and get angry. Americans need to see its okay and normal to get angry and upset. That's the point. That's whats lost on us. We've been conditioned to sit down and let these simpering bitches run rough shod over the country because we're afraid pussies in media might call us "crazy" for being upset. Fuck that, and fuck them.

    Where's our fucking spine?
     
  7. EXACTLY!!!!!

    You said it.
     
  8. Americans mostly try to play nice... not start a fight for no good reason.

    The Left/Socialists take advantage of this... ever picking away at our rights, freedoms, money. Then one day, we wake up and discover that we've given so much ground to them that they now own the lot.... we've been "frogs in a pot".

    At some point there will be push-back... but unfortunately it will be armed and bloody.

    Just as the British were our enemy in Revolutionary times, the Leftist/Socialists are the enemy of America today.

    When will we stand up? When will we say, "we're not taking this any more?"

    Obama and his supporters ARE THE ENEMY!

    :mad:
     
  9. Americans mostly try to play nice... not start a fight for no good reason.

    The Left/Socialists take advantage of this... ever picking away at our rights, freedoms, money. Then one day, we wake up and discover that we've given so much ground to them that they now own the lot.... we've been "frogs in a pot". What we SHOULD have been doing all along was to oppose them on EVERY front... not "give an inch"... because as we've learned, "give them an inch and they'll take a mile".

    At some point there will be push-back... but unfortunately not until "armed and bloody" is the only possible resolution. (Anyone doubt that? Read up on a little world and financial history...)

    Just as the British were our enemy in Revolutionary times, the Leftist/Socialists are the enemy of America today.

    When will we stand up? When will we say, "we're not taking this any more?"

    Obama and his supporters ARE THE ENEMY!

    :mad:
     
  10. lemmer

    lemmer

    Alex Jones is a lunatic. But a lunatic that completely dominated the debate and even snuck in some salient points. Namely, that crimes are lowest where gun ownership is highest. That crime is through the roof where guns are outlawed, and that people still kill with knifes, bats, etc... And finally, that his opponent was of dubious character and intent, and in fact under some suspicions in his home country. Oh, and that foreigners telling us what to do is insulting, if they don't like it they should leave.

    The Fight of the Century: Jones vs. Morgan

    By Colin Liddell

    Forget Frazier and Ali. The “Rumble in the Jungle” was just a sweaty love-in compared to the sparks that flew when the two ‘titans’ of the gun debate, Piers Morgan and Alex Jones, locked horns in a verbal duel on prime time TV (see video tab). The battle between the smug, self-important, insouciant Englishman and the barnstorming, bar-brawling, conspiracy-theorist Texan shock jock was enthralling stuff.

    We knew it was going to get down and ugly as Morgan came out with his sneering eyes and minimalist aikido of the carefully prepared 'factoid' and faced Jones with his flagrant paranoia, flapping arms, encyclopedia of conspiracy. Both had their cunning strategies for a crushing victory. Morgan hoped to use his irritating smarm to ignite Jones into a self-conflagrationary fireball of redneck lunacy, but Jones had his own game plan to unsettle the Englishman with his hairdryer-megaphone verbal approach, “in-your-face-limey” attitude, and music hall comedy English accent.

    So, who won? Opinion was initially divided. Some commentators felt that Jones had wasted a golden opportunity to showcase his calm, measured professorial side (and seemed to assume that he had one), and that he had instead been goaded like a bull to bray like a jackass. My take, however, is that Jones won hands down.

    A polite discussion with a man he is campaigning to deport would have made him look like a phony (which he may well be), so sweeping Morgan’s questions aside and being abrasive made perfect sense. Jones got a lot of good info out, while Morgan ended up repeating the same small handful of phrases. Also it was clear that Jones wasn't really a backwoods wildman completely losing it or he would have sent Morgan sprawling off his high chair or pulled out his blunderbuss.

    Finally, Jones landed plenty of clean hits on Morgan personally, reminding us that this “principled campaigner” is really just a sewer journalist who still has questions to answer back home in the UK about faking stories and hacking phones. In fact this is probably the best explanation for Morgan’s desperate attempts to climb aboard a contrived moral crusade in a country he still knows little about: the crusader's desire for the remission of past sins.
     
    #10     Jan 8, 2013