Alameda is next

Because he keeps responding then I respond and the vicious cycle goes on and on. I am tired of debating them, the debate phase ended about a year ago. (when their only argument was PRICE)

Now we are in the discovery phase. Crypto fans discovering the real world.

 

Here's Caroline Ellison, CEO of Alameda Research, a $7 billion fund with $18 billion of assets:


Prior to Alameda, Caroline spent about 18 months as a "trader" at Jane Street. That, plus a B.S. in math from Stanford 6 years ago, is the entirety of her qualifications.

 

Ahh so that explains it. Now I know why Alameda was placed as a top holding in the Woke-Feminist social action fund.

I hope everyone got what they paid for...

 

The market is still the market, you can choose to ride with it or not.

 

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2...dated-other-employees-have-lots-of-questions/

“The whole operation was run by a gang of kids in the Bahamas,” a person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk on condition of anonymity.

 

This is a good financial channel:

 

I suppose at least she can't be accused of exploiting her sex appeal.

 

And you've always been bullish, from 60k to 40k to 20k. So why criticise him when you're the other side of the same coin?

 

You're being disingenuous

If someone bought $1,000 worth of btc at $70K it is now worth worth $240
If someone bought $1,000 worth of btc when it was $2, it is now worth over $8,400,000 plus all the fork coins

And if you were an honest person, you would say I've been bullish on btc since my first post on ET when it was below $2,000

 

And if someone bought Bitcoin at $60k, they now have $16k.
You really have a one-sided view, almost funny in a markets related forum.