In college, some of my professors had an in depth understanding of the topics they were teaching but very few understood what they were writing and/or talking about. Instead, the professors had "teaching assistants" (TAs) that understood the topic along with having the job to explain (teach) to us what the professors couldn't do. Al Brooks has some followers that understand him. Doesn't it make sense to learn from those that understand his methods instead of learning from Al Brooks via the analogy involving "teaching assistants" I gave above. My point, I don't understand why so many complain about Al Brooks English when he has followers that have mastered his methods along with speaking/writing English very well (e.g. NoDoji) that are members of a dedicated forum to his methods...a forum that's free. If I had you guys attitude in college...I would have dropped 60% of my classes because the professors didn't speak clearly while knowing I had access to those (e.g. teaching assistants, tutors and fellow students) that spoke clearly and understood the topic. By the way, I recently saw a doctor (back specialist) about a back injury. I wasn't able to read what he wrote in my medical file that I had to take to a physical therapist. Does that imply the doctor does not have an in depth understanding of back problems. P.S. I don't use Al Brooks methods nor have I read the books. Yet, I do know someone that speaks/writes excellent English and has an in depth understanding of Al Brooks methods.
These people and Al are spouting the same old crap, and his followers are doing the same on this forum . Rubbish in , rubbish out.....................you put some rubbish in an empty head , rubbish comes out .............in high literary fashion. If those professors were unable to express their opinions/knowledge to the assistants , the poor students would be the victims.
Are you an agent for his courses ?Seems like all his agents are going to internet forums to raise interest in his courses ,raising false inquiries to suck noobs, then when the dirty laundry comes off , they start defending their paymasters.How many threads have been started on this forum on Al? So we have an era of pumping courses and trading education. To the OP this is nothing more than pumping and ramping courses from failures. Share ramping and 'pumping and dumping' routinely takes place each day on the hundreds of online share-dealing message boards and in thousands of spam emails that are sent out across the world, but very few people are actually brought to book. Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/...91/Avoid-the-pump-and-dump.html#ixzz2BQqSDFtQ Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I'm not, in fact I hate his writing style, hate the lack of professionalism in concepts introduction, I could go on and on for hours as to how bad Brooks writing style and way of presenting stuff is. In fact, he had the audacity to talk about concepts before introducing them, some real bad stuff, makes you wonder what kind of lame editor this guy had! Anyway, point is, that does not make the concepts useless, on the contrary, he writes about some real powerful stuff, it's too bad you need hours per page to understand them due to his horrible writing style. I am an objective guy, I can see strengths and weaknesses. Unfortunately, I wish I could say the same about you, when I read you, I only spot weakness.
Ok that is good, something positive. I read it, it's EUR/USD oriented around the 70 tick chart. Writing style is a B, vs Brooks' BIG F! Concepts however, although good, barely scratch the surface of Price Action. Consider Volman High School, and Brooks Doctorate. Someone should pay NoDoji to write about Volman and Brooks styles combined, her writing style is top notch.
One is a professional trader with clearly laid out concepts one can apply , the other a witchdoctor singing miracles and hallicunations.....and on the net they behave the same.Just google Behind every genius , is an ordinary bloke who can't express himself.