That's your opinion. If a Trader had devoloped a great System, 1 billion isn't unrealistic. Look at Jim Simmons.
Jim Simmons didn't make 700 million from selling books and courses. That is my opinion. Neither did Al. And anybody who is worth over 100 mill and still selling courses is a fucking loser in life. Not to mention over 70 y. o. You would think you could spend your time AND money better at that age. Anyhow, this thread is stupid, based on misinformation.
lets get a little perspective on this though man...$3/4 Billion sure seems like a lot though right? I really don't care either way but can see why people are skeptic.
Remove/blank out the size you're trading from the execution chart, then. Or show your fills with the QTY not showing. The way I see it, you're shilling for Al Brooks annotating a past chart with idealized entries and exits. Just like, eh, Brooks and any other vendor would.
Why can't anyone here prove it wrong. Where's our Super Sleuths. But he has been trading since 1987, apparently.
AI found A.L. Brooks lol. I've never seen his name as anything other than as Al Brooks. No middle name or initial sited anywhere. The spelling of his name is not the only thing AI got screwy.
Live market right now and my long entry was 4374 posted before the open. Plenty of opportunity for anyone to get that same price after the open. The standard Brooks entry would not yet have traded. Standard entry would be a buy stop at 4386.50. If the current candle closes without trading above that price, while staying inside the range of the four hour candle that closed at ten AM Eastern Standard Time, then the new long entry order would be one tick above the high of this current candle. I'm shilling for no one. Just sharing that I have purchased the Brooks Trading course and I am trading using ideas, concepts, and set ups I learned from that course.