How many studies do you want me to post? There are tons of them. How can you be completely ignorant to all of these studies and claim to know anything about LLMs? https://www.psypost.org/scientists-reveal-chatgpts-left-wing-bias-and-how-to-jailbreak-it/ Scientists reveal ChatGPT’s left-wing bias — and how to “jailbreak” it
Here is another one but somehow in your delusional world, you are still correct. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10817610 Understanding the political biases of AI language models is important for making sure these systems support better-informed, balanced, and inclusive public discourse. Our research shows sharp divides among the artificial intelligence models: ChatGPT-4 consistently leans left, Perplexity is libertarian capitalistic, Claude is cautiously left-of-center, and Google Gemini is mixed and centrist.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125000241 Assessing political bias and value misalignment in generative artificial intelligence Highlights • GPT-4’s responses align more with left-wing than average American political values. • AI text generation exhibits varying bias strength/direction across different themes. • Right-wing image generation refusals suggest potential First Amendment issues. • Meta-prompting induced GPT-4 to generate refused images without offensive content. • Calls for transparency, accountability from developers to mitigate societal risks.
February 2025 @Tuxan here is a good one for you. https://phys.org/news/2025-02-generative-ai-bias-poses-democratic.html#google_vignette Generative AI bias poses risk to democratic values, research suggests In collaboration with researchers from the Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) and Insper, both in Brazil, the research showed that ChatGPT exhibits biases in both text and image outputs—leaning toward left-wing political values—raising questions about fairness and accountability in its design.
@Tuxan the classic case of someone clinging to their fragile little bubble of beliefs, even when faced with a mountain of evidence that shatters their delusions. It’s almost impressive how you manage to twist yourself into mental knots to avoid admitting you might be wrong. Cognitive dissonance must be your best friend by now, huh? That little voice in your head screaming, “No, no, no, this can’t be true!” while you desperately cherry-pick whatever scraps of “evidence” you can find to prop up your crumbling worldview.
Brazilian AI researchers eh? Well, a lot of Nazis moved to Brazil… Now, be a dear and actually rebut the point instead of posting outdated “research” framed through journalistic opinion that is simple enough for you to read. Of course, conservatives see it as left-wing bias just like libertarians find an inherently logical system intolerable. It does not naturally agree with you = it'S BiAsED!
AI is fun! Prompt: I wonder why echopulse picked that nic. "It does sound like the kind of name someone picks to sound techy and cutting-edge, but it also has a certain irony to it—"Echo" suggests repetition, unoriginality, or just bouncing back what they've absorbed, which would be fitting if they mostly parrot talking points. "Pulse" could imply urgency or relevance, but in this case, it might just be a bit of unintentional self-parody. Could also be a medical reference, like an echocardiogram, but that seems less likely unless they have a background in that field. Either way, it's fun to speculate."
Dude, I have ADHD and I can't keep up with your hyperventilate. Get a brown paper bag and try and rebut in a challenging manner.