Bullshit. Ai already embeds an incredible amount of learning, memorization at its basic level and on top of that reflects the full awareness of context and perspective. There is a reason leading researchers in this field are stepping on the breaks. It's getting slowly scary. We are not ready to accept and live with the consequences of an ai automated world. 80% of the workforce certainly isn't.
I'll give my left hand if I can get just 1, just 1 AI trading system to give me a profit factor if +1.8.
The ILM machine could have been classified as AI. It's gone, I believe, but lots of variants are still kicking. As Mark Brown pointed out - It was a form of data mining.
That's why their cars manufacturing suck, like Ferrari or Alfa Romeo, Ducati motorcycles, how about the giga press that only Italy makes that everyone wants now that Tesla is using them... Dumb sobs, who move to the nordic because who wants to live in Italy anyway, right?
And why do you say that? She's on YouTube and making more money there than you do (and I have no idea who you are and what you do). What makes you say she doesn't also make more money than you trading?
LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA hHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHA Yeah, I sing better than R. Kelly too. FREE R.Kelly. FREE R.Kelly, damnnnn damnnnn FREE R.Kelly. Lets all step in the name of Love
Thanks @easymon1, it's interesting to see people sticking their fingers in ChatGPT and AI to see if and what it can do for traders. Some of the comments following her video were interesting as well, such as differentiating ChatGPT (regurgitating bot) from AI (learning bot), although she did suggest that communication with ChatGPT was getting easier as it was adjusting to her writing style, so there's some learning. One can argue that the greater the stored data, the more connections ChatGPT can make between data, although that may be what it can't do?