‘Hope Now’?: US, banks, near plan to freeze subprime rates

Discussion in 'Economics' started by ASusilovic, Nov 30, 2007.

  1. The gummint is obviously doing whatever they can to avoid the set-off of Credit Default Swaps (45.5 TRILLION $$ worth in US), which would make subprime look like childs play. Goldman holds bags of this shit and doesn't report it on the books.
     
    #11     Nov 30, 2007
  2. jd7419

    jd7419

    I agree. The government can't stop the inevitable they can only forestall it. I guess after they freeze these assclowns rates they will take a look at forgiving their credit card debts as well. Ah don't you love capitalism.
     
    #12     Nov 30, 2007
  3. The only thing that should be adjusted in the resets is the LIBOR benchmark.

    Detach LIBOR as the benchmark against which the resets will take place and replace it with a more traditional benchmark against the US 10 year treasury note.

    This simple action would make the Fed rate cuts more effective in helping mortgage resets. Many foreclosures would still happen, but there would be a good portion of people able to afford the new resets and lock in at a good long term rate.

    LIBOR is running high due to the mismanagement at the banks and the general distrust of one bank to another. Getting away from the LIBOR adjustments would start to unlock some of the credit freeze that exists right now.

    Good Luck!
     
    #13     Nov 30, 2007
  4. piezoe

    piezoe

    Exactly! For folks with low interest, fixed rate loans, inflation will make their payments seem very low in a few years. The cost of the money they borrowed can even become negative.

    But subprime borrowers with ARM's are essentially locked out of this otherwise happy situation. In a word, they are screwed if interest rates rise, as they will likely do, since we have been in a period of historically low rates. In that case, about all they can do is hope to hang on long enough for 1. a sponsored bailout to come along, or 2. wages to rise faster than interest rates, or 3. property appreciation faster than rate increases, which would allow them to exit these bad loans.

    There is a sort of a catch 22 situation for subprime lenders. Higher risk demands higher yield, but higher yield increases the risk of default. It is possible that lenders have been excessively downrating subprimes, i.e., demanding too much interest premium, and as a result, actually increasing risk. There is obviously an optimum interest rate that minimizes risk and maximizes return.

    The typical subprime borrower is financially unsophisticated, so even if a path out of their dilemma were available, many would not realize it. The mortgage paper holders must therefore take the lead in protecting their own interests by aligning them with those of the borrower. In the present case, it would seem that some of these holders have realized that half a loaf is better than none. They will be willing to compromise on the returns from these loans. The damage will be bad, but not so bad as it could become if they refuse to compromise. Of course, in reality, they may have enough political power to demand and get a taxpayer bailout. Let's hope not.
     
    #14     Dec 1, 2007