You don't know that Salby is a fraud and an ass and you don't know what a greenhouse gas is. That's pretty pathetic. How come you don't change to your gwb persona and start posting dumb cartoons?
how many times you pathetic little sock puppet troll am I going to have to give you NASA quotes showing that CO2 is a coolant... greenhouse gases cool and warm, you troll. you are are going to keep writing the same stupid detritus over an over and we are going to correct your ignorant drone ass. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space. and note I am not gwb... but you are tweedle dee
Listen you fucking asshole. We know that CO2 cools.....the fucking STRATOSPHERE you lying piece of shit. More irrelevant bullshit. So now , you don't know what layer of the atmosphere we live in, in addition to not knowing what a greenhouse gas is and does. Wow, you're fucked up. Just go back to your gwb persona and post pictures. They always amuse the low intelligence GW deniers.
and by keeping the sun's energy out co2 keeps the the earth cooler... or is that too much thinking for a drone. click the link and learn something..
the agw nutter knockout 1 -2 punch... If you keep repeating your crap I will post this. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...2/22mar_saber/ For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space. and http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...21818112001658 Abstract Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the period January 1980 to December 2011. Ice cores show atmospheric CO2 variations to lag behind atmospheric temperature changes on a century to millennium scale, but modern temperature is expected to lag changes in atmospheric CO2, as the atmospheric temperature increase since about 1975 generally is assumed to be caused by the modern increase in CO2. In our analysis we use eight well-known datasets: 1) globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions. Annual cycles are present in all datasets except 7) and 8), and to remove the influence of these we analyze 12-month averaged data. We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 1112 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5
If over the course of 50 years of life there is snow on the ground every single winter, then i look out my window and see record amounts of snow on the ground, would it not be a safe bet to say there will be snow on the ground each winter for the next ten years? You talk about "Trends" but dont seem to know what the word means. Would the trend of snow on the ground point to us having some snow on the ground next winter or having no snow on the ground next winter? There is simply no logical way to interpret past data and say that we are witnessing the end of snow like the jackass in the NYT article claimed, unless you are so self absorbed that you think you are so special you are going to witness something that hasnt happened in 4 billion years. Ill tell you what, i will bet you everything your worth that there will be snow on the ground in new york and various other areas of the planet every single year over the next 30 years. Take the bet or admit that claiming we are witnessing the end of snow is nothing more than global warming alarmist bullshit.
With two thirds of the U.S. covered in snow globull warming alarmist claims, "Within a few years children wont know what snow is." though i must admit i thought that snow dissappeared in the mid 90's <iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Byh5k-m2SqI?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Over Two Thirds of Continental U.S. Covered in Snow by DAN RIEHL 9 Feb 2014, 11:37 AM PDT 885 POST A COMMENT More than two thirds of the continental United States is currently covered in snow, according to new data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). With 67.4% of the contiguous United States now covered with snow, up from 48.1% last month, the so called Polar Vortex would appear to be leaving Global Warming fear mongers lost in a vortex all their own. Contrast current data and images with these words from Dr. David Viner. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”. “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said. Not to be deterred in his battle against what some view as more climate fabulists, than scientists, Mark Steyn takes on a "Ship of Fools" in The Spectator this month. Yes, yes, just to get the obligatory ‘of courses’ out of the way up front: of course ‘weather’ is not the same as ‘climate’; and of course the thickest iciest ice on record could well be evidence of ‘global warming’, just as 40-and-sunny and a 35-below blizzard and 12 degrees and partly cloudy with occasional showers are all apparently manifestations of ‘climate change’; and of course the global warm-mongers are entirely sincere in their belief that the massive carbon footprint of their rescue operation can be offset by the planting of wall-to-wall trees the length and breadth of Australia, Britain, America and continental Europe. Big Climate is slowly being crushed by a hard, icy reality: if you’re heading off to university this year, there has been no global warming since before you were in kindergarten. That’s to say, the story of the early 21st century is that the climate declined to follow the climate ‘models’. Really, there's little that's more unsightly than an adult so called scientist crying test tubes full of tears over their broken model. Unfortunately for many, that's precisely what recent weather patterns have done - shatter the models these so called scientists have been employing in their war on capitalism for decades.
Sochi is a <b>subtropical</b> resort. Now you know why it was selected for the winter olympics. To "feature" a lack of snow at the winter olympics. At a <b>subtropical</b> resort. It simply goes without saying that anything that comes out of their mouths or off of their keyboards is meant to deceive you.
A new record low June snow cover extent (SCE) for the Northern Hemisphere (when snow cover is mainly located over the Arctic) was set in 2012. A new record low May SCE was also established over Eurasia. 2012 spring snow cover duration was the second shortest on record for both the North American and Eurasian sectors of the Arctic because of earlier than normal snow melt. The rate of loss of June snow cover extent between 1979 and 2012 (-17.6% per decade relative to the 1979-2000 mean) is greater than the loss of September sea ice extent (-13.0% per decade) over the same period. http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/report12/snow.html