If liberal critics really care about this issue, they would not lie about it. The Media Are Lying About Trump Separating Illegal Immigrant Families. Here’s The Truth. By BEN SHAPIRO Over the weekend, the media went insane over the supposed Trump administration policy of separating illegal immigrant parents from their children. According to the media, Trump could with one quick fix simply prevent the separation of children from their parents; according to the media, all Trump has to do is wave his magic wand, and all will be well. This is a lie. More specifically, it’s several lies. 1. Trump Created Separation Of Children From Illegal Immigrant Parents. This is plainly false. In 1997, the federal government made an agreement in a case called Flores not to keep unaccompanied illegal immigrant children in custody beyond twenty days. The settlement said nothing about accompanied illegal immigrant children – children who crossed the border with their parents. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals then ruled that accompanied children also could not be held in custody under the terms of the settlement. This meant that the government either had to release whole families, or that the government had to separate parents from children. 2. Immigrants Seeking Asylum Are Being Punished For Seeking Asylum. This is plainly untrue as well. Immigrants who come to points of entry to seek asylum aren’t actually illegally in the country – they’re not arrested. They’re processed through ICE, and their children stay with them. If, however, illegal immigrants cross the border illegally, the Trump administration now treats them as criminals. If they choose deportation, they aren’t separated from their kids; if they choose to apply for asylum, they stay in the country longer than 20 days, and their kids have to be removed by operation of law. 3. The Trump Facilities Are Awful Thanks To Trump. They may be awful, but they were just as awful under President Obama. These are pictures from Brandon Darby of Breitbart circa 2014: Brandon Darby Re: “Cages” —- The chainlink partitions in the holding facilities at border are the exact same ones we showed you during the Obama Admin. Why didn’t you care then? Cc @joelpollak Brandon Darby Image #1 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/GHYfs4a7sO 5:11 PM - Jun 17, 2018 Brandon Darby Replying to @brandondarby Image #1 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/GHYfs4a7sO Brandon Darby Image #2 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/5s31QgL9sH 5:12 PM - Jun 17, 2018 Brandon Darby Replying to @brandondarby Image #2 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/5s31QgL9sH Brandon Darby Image #3 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/m2Pjy59FR4 5:13 PM - Jun 17, 2018 Brandon Darby ✔@brandondarby 19h Replying to @brandondarby Image #5 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/dakVvUY31E Brandon Darby ✔@brandondarby Image #6 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/NcCklvdcbq 5:16 PM - Jun 17, 2018 The big mistake made by the Trump administration here came courtesy of Stephen Miller and John Kelly, both of whom reportedly stated that the administration was separating kids from parents as a sort of deterrent. That’s idiotic. The deterrent is arrest and deportation, not separating children from parents. That’s why the House is attempting to pass some sort of fix here to keep kids with their parents. But with that said, the media coverage of this issue has been patently irresponsible. Trump isn’t forcing children away from parents. He’s enforcing the law on the books. The legislature can fix that law at any time. The facilities he’s using are the same facilities Obama used. Pretending that this is Japanese internment (as Laura Bush suggested) or the Holocaust (as General Michael Hayden suggested) is ridiculous. This policy ought to be fixed. But lying about it isn’t designed to fix it. It’s designed to prevent a fix by allowing Democrats to play political football with children, believing they’re winning a victory by holding Trump’s feet to the fire with pictures of crying children. https://www.dailywire.com/news/31979/media-are-lying-about-trump-separating-illegal-ben-shapiro
Congress can act as quickly or slowly as they choose. They always act in their own grandstanding self interest and in this case their own self interest is to be slow. It's campaign season, but then, when isn't it? What you're wanting the president to do is ignore the existing laws by in large, as other president s have done, thereby perpetuating the never ending problem. Again, politics as usual, give the appearance of doing something while doing nothing of substance. Again, the never ending campaign trail mentality of governing. What this president is doing is laying it squarely where it belongs, right in the laps of congress and trying to actually find a solution. yeah, I know, not considered normal behavior in politics which is why they're all so mystified about it.
Nice try but the real Jew-haters are on the left, starting with DNC vice chair Keith Ellison and his ties to rabid antisemite Louis Farrakhan. Even the leftist WaPo gave him four Pinocchios for lying about it. DNC vice chair Keith Ellison and Louis Farrakhan: ‘No relationship’? http://wapo.st/2Fz4SZT?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.8e072cd47f18 P.S. Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November.
So congress consists of a house with 435 representatives and a senate of 100 senators. That’s two bodies with 535 people that need to pass legislation Trump will sign and you think that can be done quickly? You seem disconnected from reality by repeating the same absurd claim. Like I said, it would behoove you to learn more about your government.
They have had, quite literally, decades to work on this. They have done nothing, absolutely nothing. Now I'm not saying they don't have an excuse for doing nothing. They are, and have been quite busy forming endless committees to investigate their own corruption, unethical and often criminal behavior, while grandstanding for the cameras with feigned outrage. Then they have to appear on any number of cable news outlets and do it all over again with the talking heads.That does take time. Now the ever biased fanatics, both left and right, would accuse the other side of perpetuating all this nonsense, but people like myself who know that both sides of this rotten coin are equally corrupt won't buy that B.S. Facts are facts, and the fact is congress had had, still have, and will continue to have the power and authority to pass any legislation they want, with or without presidential encouragement or approval. And if it's so god damn pressing, they can do it tonight. In the meantime you can go find and illegal and buy the poor fuck a Happy Meal. It's the least you can do.
If these illegals were all white South Africans fleeing genocide, democrats would be demanding automatic machine guns on the border to stop them. When you hear their cries of anguish, keep in mind it is all an act put on by trained seals to gaslight you. Their only interest in immigrants is more votes and more welfare. And they clearly have no interest in the legacy americans, many of them minorities, who are seeing their wages depressed by immigrant labor.
Penalties under 222(g) If an alien is determined to be a "visa overstay" under this section, he/she is subject to the following penalties: Cancellation of visa The law provides that the visa of individuals who overstay is automatically voided and all future nonimmigrant visas must be obtained in the country of nationality, except for those who are eligible for an exemption due to "extraordinary circumstances." If the individual has more than one visa in the passport, only the visa that was used to enter the country is considered to be void, but when the other visa expires, a new visa application must be made in the home country (DOS cable, June 1999). It is important to remember that I.N.A. § 222(g) can only be used to deny a visa if the applicant is a third-country national applying in a country other than the home country. If an individual who is subject to I.N.A. § 222(g) applies for a visa at a U.S. consular office in his or her home country, § 222(g) is not a basis for denial of the visa. Restriction on place of future visa applications If subject to INA § 222(g), the alien is permanently limited to applying for future nonimmigrant visas only at a U.S. consular office located in the country of his or her nationality, unless the Department of State finds that "extraordinary circumstances" exist. Under federal law, possession by itself is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison and up to $1,000 fine for a first offense. ... Federalprosecutors may also prosecute asmarijuana crimes conduct that is legal under a state's law. Again, you might do well with brushing up on this so your arguments are based in fact
This is problematic for the left moving forward. Black communities are hit the hardest by this and so far the left has done a good job of blaming whitey for everything. As the complexion of America continues to darken up this will become ever more difficult sale to make as time goes on. More and more "people of color" will be in the governing and decision making positions. What do they do when they run out of Caucasians to blame? We have seen the results of what happens when whitey leaves and guilt ridden white leftists and their black counterparts are totally self governing. Ghetto after ghetto. One thing they always overlook is when whitey leaves, whitey takes his money with him. In their perfect delusion whitey gets the boot while still financing their game, to which I say, good luck with that plan. One more thing. Mexicans and Blacks don't mix all that well by my observation, and while the white man may end up migrating back to his ancestors country of origin, blacks ain't going back to the homeland, and neither are the Muslims, which is a whole other can of corn to deal with. No, the America that the left dreams of where the evil white devil is gone won't be the Shangri-La they are trying to sell.
The liberal ninth circuit court mandated the separation of children from adults in detention. This ruling pertained to people detained over twenty days, who entered the country illegally, claiming asylum. A law reversing the ninth circuit court's child separation ruling could be enacted within a week. This new law would keep the asylum seeker's family together, in custody, until their case is adjudicated.
“We have to send a clear message, just because your child gets across the border, that doesn't mean the child gets to stay. So, we don't want to send a message that is contrary to our laws or will encourage more children to make that dangerous journey.” What kind of horrible person would say such a thing? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...l-immigrant-children-should-be-sent-back.html