Puhleese!!! We all know that Iraq is Bush's war, we all know that a lot of democratic politicians were(are) spineless (not Al Gore btw) and we all know that no democratic politician would have invaded Iraq if he was president. PS Believing that Saddam had WMD and invading Iraq are not the same things, are they lucas? Or is that too complicated?
I guess you didn't read the quotes. "I will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force." Or is that too complicated? Need more??? Let me know.
But ALL Democrats are spineless, including any elected Democrat president. Therefore, the Republicans in Congress (majority or minority) could still convince the Democrats to invade Iraq, including a spineless Democrat president. If this mix existed today, however, we would have cut and run years ago, leaving Iraq in a bloody mess. That's why the Dems today can't be trusted in a time of war.
The U.S. military said Friday that al-Zarqawi was alive for a brief time after the strike. When U.S. troops arrived at the scene, Iraq's most wanted terrorist was on a stretcher and "mumbled a little something indistinguishable", trying to move before he died, U.S. Army Maj. Gen. William Caldwell told reporters. "Zarqawi did survive the airstrike," Caldwell said. "We did in fact see him alive." "The first people on the scene were the Iraqi police," Caldwell said Friday. "They had found him and put him into some kind of gurney, stretcher ... and then American coalition forces arrived." (Map of target) "According to the person on the ground, Zarqawi attempted to ... turn away off the stretcher," he said. "Everybody re-secured him back on to the stretcher but he died almost immediately thereafter from the wounds he had received from the airstrike." I truly hope that he was indeed alive when US troops arrived at the scene. I hope that he was alive, in a great deal of pain, and that he was cognicent of what had just happened to him. Prior to his rendezvous with the 72 sluts in Hell, I also hope that he was able to notice that he was surrounded by American troops, and the reason he "attempted to turn away off the stretcher" was because of that realization.
ratboy, you think your are to the right, but if you are the the guy with the conspriacy theiries, you are so far right on the the sprectrum you have bent around back to the left. Or at least many of your ideas are associated with the far left. Also please note, neither you are El Cubano contradicted my post about afghanistan. Yet you said he is always right --- that was the point I was making. Distorted Lens. Finally, I am no neocon. I am in favor of protecting the environment in a rational way and I detest the crazy spending that is going on. And have been harping on the spending issues as soon as I thought we cleared Clinton's (ha) rescession.
Careful now... with statements like that, the politically correct Ms. Sheehan, Mr. Berg, and numerous posters on this board will claim you're the monster/terrorist, not him. Oh wait, I'm not supposed to use the word "terrorist", it's now "insurgent". That wasn't very PC of me, sorry.
Let 'em rant, let 'em rant. The criticisms of moonbats who feel more sympathy for murdering criminals than victims bounce off me in the manner that they are immune to common sense.
No not complicated at all, that's exactly what I was saying, the politician who said that was spineless but the war was started by Bush who abused the authority granted to him by spineless politicians. I am glad and pleasantly surprised you're finally getting it though.
Do you have a real person in mind "who feel more sympathy for murdering criminals than victims" or you take lucas's word that they exist instead?
Dean, Feingold, Gore, 21 democratic senators, 133 democratic congresmen voted against the resolution. Once again you've demonstrated your ignorance. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/iraq.us/