Are you out of your mind? Legal concepts don not apply during war? Need I remind you of WWII and how legal concepts were applied? Oh yeah, legal concept during war apply to ONLY your like right ddd? Fourth Geneva Convention was only created for you and anyone who dares to apply it to another nation is an anti semite right ddd? Extra Judaical assassination is prohibited by international laws. Now I am aware that you are brought up to think that you and the state of Israel are above international laws and morality but international laws state that what your state is doing against a nation under occupation IS a "WAR CRIME" (9) Israel's policy of extra-judicial assassinations, referred to by the Israeli government as âtargeted killings,â is incongruent with the Fourth Geneva Convention and United Nations Principles on extra-legal killings, has been condemned by the State Department (see the 2003 Human Rights Reports), and is in violation of U.N. Security Council Resolutions 471 (1980) and 605 (1987). http://www.cnionline.org/speakout/petitions/act.htm But why should you care when your state is nothing but a mosaic of international laws violations from home demolition to building settlements in occupied territories to torture of detainees. P.s. You were at a part on a Sunday? You are running out of excuses Zino boy.
Thanks Bitstream! unfortunately, I am here for 8 more days after which, the Zionist will have a free hand to spread their lies.
Michael Berg and the twisted values of the green and pacifism Jun 13, 2006 by Dennis Prager Apparently, being the parent of a child murdered by a Muslim terrorist gives one moral credibility. There is no other way to explain the vast attention paid to the ideas of Michael Berg, father of Nick Berg, the American who was slaughtered by the Islamic sadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. That is also the only explanation for the all the attention Cindy Sheehan has received. It is not because of the intellectual and moral depth of her worldview. But the attention paid to Michael Berg has been very helpful in enabling many more people to understand the thinking and values of the Green Party -- and those on the left sympathetic to the Greens -- and of pacifism. Thinking and values that are, in a word, twisted. Michael Berg is a Green Party candidate for Congress from the state of Delaware and a pacifist. According to The Associated Press and many other reports, Berg believes George W. Bush is more evil than Zarqawi. Berg said that the blame for most deaths in Iraq should be placed on President Bush, who he said is "more of a terrorist than Zarqawi." Here is one example: "Zarqawi felt my son's breath on his hand as held the knife against his throat. Zarqawi had to look in his eyes when he did it. George Bush sits there glassy-eyed in his office with pieces of paper and condemns people to death. That to me is a real terrorist." When asked on CNN about his reaction to the death of Zarqawi, he responded: "Well, my reaction is I'm sorry whenever any human being dies. Zarqawi is a human being." The incredulous CNN interviewer, Soledad O'Brien, then asked Berg, "At some point, one would think, is there a moment when you say, 'I'm glad he's dead, the man who killed my son'?" Berg responded: "No. How can a human being be glad that another human being is dead?" Thanks to such views, Berg has been nominated by the Green Party to be its candidate for Congress for the lone congressional seat in Delaware. If the fact that a man who regards his son's butcher as a better man than the American president is rewarded with a party's nomination to Congress does not tell you all you need to know about the morally twisted world of the Greens, nothing will. It was, I believe, David Horowitz who first pointed out that with the death of communism, those who held communist views will morph from Reds to Greens -- "watermelons," he called them: green on the outside, red on the inside. Why worshippers of nature lose their moral bearings is a question for another column. Thanks to Michael Berg, the country also better knows the warped moral universe of pacifists. Pacifists are often personally sweet and endearing people who advocate "peace," and therefore their doctrine is usually spared the moral contempt it merits. Among its many moral and intellectual weaknesses, pacifism ensures that cruelty will prevail on earth. When asked by talk show host Michael Medved if he, Berg, would have killed Zarqawi as the terrorist was about to cut his son's throat, Berg said he would instead throw his body in front of the knife -- thereby ensuring, as Medved noted, that two innocent people would be murdered. That is the consequence of pacifism -- far more cruelty and death. But the spread of evil apparently means little to pacifists. There must be some joy in feeling oneself so morally superior to those who believe that killing is sometimes morally necessary that even the ritual murder of one's son does not shake the pacifist's fanaticism. The more Michael Berg speaks -- using the murder of his son, a Bush supporter and supporter of the war in Iraq, to publicize his views -- the better it is. Because every time Michael Berg speaks, he shines a needed light on the moral darkness of the Greens and of pacifism. http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/dennisprager/2006/06/13/200949.html
Following Prager's "logic" Martin Luther king had twisted and warped values.... Mohandas Gandhi had twisted and warped moral values... Jesus Christ had twisted and moral values... Lord Gautama Buddha had twisted and warped moral values... These four very famous pacifists had warped and twisted moral values... Why? Because Dennis Prager says so...and he is the moral authority... Oh, and it is okay for parents who had children killed by pedophiles to have moral superiority, celebrity status, and speak out against pedophilia on the basis of their loss, and no one had dare question what they say or their moral authority, or money they might make on books, appearance fees, etc. for having lost a child....or a parent or spouse who lost a love one or child due to a murder, drunk driver, etc. may speak out about the death of their love one have a political opinion, and profit from it pesonally....but it is not okay for a parent who had a child killed in a war, or a spouse who died on 9/11 to speak out... I also wonder if hundreds or thousands of years from now or more, if the religion of Pragerism will be as big as Christianity or Buddhism worldwide....
But I read Prager's column as saying it is a good thing this Berg guy is getting wide publicity. It's hard to listen to Berg without realizing how silly his arguments are. As for Jesus, he said love your neighbor, not let him come over and cut your son's head off, then act like nothing had happened.
still no one wonders why berg was riding around on a bus with the 19th terrorist sharing his laptop and passwords. LOL LOL LOL LOL just get me a bigger spoon?
Turning the other cheek is a pacifist position.... Many in Rome thought Christ's arguments were silly... Same for the others...
But isn't it sophistry to generalize from "turn the other cheek" to total passivity in the face of evil? Do you honestly think Jesus' advice if he were here would be to let any muslim who wants to kill Christians to just go right ahead and not attempt to stop them? If that had been Jesus' message, wouldn't he have denounced the heroes of the Old Testament, like Moses and David, who slew philistines by the thousands and seized the Promised Land by force? How do pacifists like Berg advocate dealing with violent criminals in this country? Reason with them? Pacifists, for all their moral preening, are ultimately immoral. They sit back and carp, leaving others to do the dirty work. If they got their way, savagery would rule, the weak would be at the mercy of the strong and might would make right.