http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/01/28/nastiest-ceo-lashes-out-at-goldman/ After this length of time, after the pain and destruction of the past two years perpetrated by the previous ten or so, that these people can still spew such obviously skewed vitriole. He must have them by the balls.
I thought the article was unprofessional. It's supposed to be a business journal, yet it read more like gossip. The title "nastiest CEO" seemed like an epic overreach, and the only support offered was he objected to an illegal practice, naked shorting. The fact that the company had mediocre earnings is irrelevant to the legality of naked shorting.