If you or the rest of your nut case buddies had anything Obama wouldn't be President.On the bright side you do have Sarah Palin in 2012 You're welcome
Who was the biggest beneficiary of 9/11? The answer is the bush presidency. Bush went from a so so president with dubious legitimacy to someone with 90+% approval ratings and unstoppable teflon. 9/11 allowed iraq war and all that happened required 9/11. 9/11 is exactly the grand blank check to draw US into all kinds of imperialistic nonsense. Afghanistan war has more to do with control of central asia (grand game version 2.0) than anything else while iraq war is about oil/ control of middle east. Dialogue is more open in europe concerning 9/11 for the simple reason that europeans are not hung up on the idea that US government "can never do something like this". Recently some scientists from denmark found nanothermite in a sample of 9/11 rubble. Was there any coverage of that in the US? NO.
How can "we" have anything when your courts keeps saying the citizens of the US have no standing in asking the POTUS to provide proof of eligibility? You appear to be assuming I am a card carrying Republican. If so, you would be sadly mistaken, as I am merely a lone guy in the middle watching the lunacy on both sides of the fence. But I must say, the degree of lunacy coming from the left is astonishingly higher than from the right. Waaaay higher! In regards to Sara Palin, is she that smart MILF who resides in the 59th state? Or was it the 60th, I can't recall? Have a nice night!!
Proof of eligibility has already been provided and vouched for by government officers of the state of hawaii. At that point any reasonable person shuts up.
The halfrican was never properly vetted. To believe otherwise is insanity. I take it you believe everything the government tells you? No need to respond, the answer is already quite apparent. I travel in a wide circle of friends, family, and associates. And although I rarely initiate political discussion within that circle, people are voicing their distrust for the halfrican without prompting. The halfrican is obviously hiding something of great magnitude; why else would he and his handlers spend vast amounts of money and energy to keep his records under wrap? That seems to be the question you and your ilk are unable to answer, yet accept as being acceptable. The halfrican is a puppet to move forward an agenda. And that agenda is socialism. I'm sorry to hear you are in agreement with that camp.
You are a moron. It is not the government it is the people of opposite party that have no reason to cover for Obama. If you are not satified with their testimony any piece of paper that obama can produce will not be legit for you since it will have to be vouched for by those same people that are vouching for the short form certificate.
I'm sure not ONE person in the history of the world ever duped the United States into giving their foreign born child a US passport. Especially in such an incredibly advanced technological age as the 1960s when everything was done on paper! If you are american and your kid is born in a foreign country, all you need is to send a cashiers check to the press in hawaii to make the announcement. Getting a birth certificate would be even easier back then. All you had to do was ask a hosptial for it (even if you knew there wasnt one) When they say they cant find it, they would just have the parent fill out the form and they would issue a new one based soley on the word of the parent (birth certificates got lost all the time back then too and this was completely common for this to happen) I'm sure his mom was no fool and knew that doing this was cheaper and faster than going through all that paperwork at INS to get him citizenship and an american passport that would make it so much easier for him to travel around with her from indonesia/africa or where ever they were at. If you are born in a poor country, it takes months to get a visa today(in the 60s I imagine it took years since things moved alot slower back then without computers) Plus visas can be expensive. Why wouldnt his mother fake a birth certificate if he was born overseas? It makes alot of sense really.
Hit a nerve, did I? Seems so! Nonetheless, I'm still waiting for an answer to an obvious question; why is the halfrican spending such a vast amount of energy and money keeping his records sealed? It's a simple question, really it is. If there is nothing to hide, then why hide it? And speaking of "any piece of paper," not one piece of paper has ever been produced by the halfrican other than an abbreviated digital copy of a supposed birth certificate no one has ever seen. And that was proven to be a forgery. No passport records, no school records, nothing, nada. Only a complete nitwit would defend the halfricans hiding his records from the public for no other reason that party line affiliation and getting a tingle up their leg at the mere thought of the halfrican being their leader of idiocy beliefs. Admit it, the halfrican was given a pass for no other reason than he said he was black and a far left loon. And even his being black is an outright lie. Social engineering at its finest moment, and you and your ilk drank the koolaid like lap dogs in heat. And by the way, being a bag boy at Publix hardly gives you the proper credentials for calling someone a moron. You have a great night!!!!
All I ask is to see this much heralded proof. And beside what were the vouching for? Did you believe Cheny or Bush when they were vouching... or Powell at the u.n.? Why would anyone believe a government official who was "vouching" when they could be producing originals? Trust but Verify Ask a documentationist.