Reasonable doubt is all you can be certain of, but you've been writing as if you KNOW what happened. I have too, but we're both merely expressing opinion. "Three sides to every story. Your side, my side, and the truth"
Yes. Sadly, trendlover would convict an innocent man, and have him imprisoned. She can't grasp the fact that travon waited for Zimmerman, then confronted him.
So true. And had the bad guy been white, there would have never been a court action. It's amazing the liberal lunatics here can't see that.
The trayvon defenders just seem incapable of processing this. The prosecutors deal with it by denying it happened and accusing Zimmerman of lying about it. But we have the timeline of the two calls, so we know trayvon had time to get home. We know Zimmerman had lost track of him from his call to the police. To convict Zimmerman, they are asking the jury to imagine a version of facts that not a shred of evidence supports.
Liberals have two views of what happened- 1) Zimmerman ambushed a little kid and shot him for no reason. 2) George Bush did it.
Don't know if it is possible to get a fair trial as Obama had already showed his favoritism at the beginning of the incident. If the jury are obamabots, God help us all.
Obama says his son would look like Trayvon. I wonder if he was trying to sway the jury. His son looks like Eric Holder to me.