Are you, therefore, even more disturbed by the much greater drawdown and availability of tech stocks? Perhaps you think there should be new regulations to protect people from those? How about sector mutual funds? Perhaps only accredited people should be allowed into casinos? What makes you think you should tell other people what they can and cannot do with their money? Are you really in favor of a nanny government?
I can "bash" him, you can "bash" me, it is meaningless, right? In the final analysis, what really matters is those investors who are down 38% for the year.
you need to learn to read. as an anarchocapitalist and free market proponent, i find your allegations, based on my post, outrageous and moronic. my post was stating fact, not opinions. where did i say that i agreed with the regulations ?? the FACT is bending of the current hedge fund regulations is leading to more and stiffer regulations. what part of that do you not understand ?? surfer
And he was up over 90% last year. His trading is volatile. Is this the point you're making?! Because if it is, you don't need to...it's rather obvious!?!
That you can continue to pump this guy, and rationalize 4 losing months in a row......on a "technical system", down 38% in those 4 months thus far is odd. He will have to gain over 50% just to break even for the year. And if I read his fee structure correctly, gains at this point, even from the low level mark, are such that he can participate in the profits....further eroding the chance for investors to recover. This is a total losing situation for an investor who came in at the first of the year, based on someone pumping 97% returns the previous year. Could he do it? Hell, I don't know, but any system that depends on a return of greater than 50% just to break even is a loser system. Obviously, you don't know shit about money management, or you wouldn't defend him the way you do. His track record is a disaster at this point. I have seen it time and time again when I was in the managed futures business. Schindler is a hack.
Ya, no regulation in the financial industry, great idea. No compliance, no suitability. You are a fool. Schindler is a lawsuit waiting to happen. You have never been on the wrong end of a lawsuit by a disgruntled investor, who wasn't properly educated, and determined suitable for risk. I guarantee you, if due diligence was not done and strict compliance with commodity pools and risk disclosure wasn't performed, Schindler is in a heap of trouble. More troubling will be when the investors in his fund realize how much of their money went to fees and commissions.
So emotional you are!!! I am pumping him up? Says you! But then again, you say alot! Down 38% is odd? Says you again! I didn't know you knew the parameters of his system and if that was within its range of volatility. Any system that depends on a return of greater than 50% just to break even? Aren't there funds down 38% from their highs? I could sure find some! I don't know shit about money management? Coming from you, I don't know whether that is an insult or a compliment!?! Will he succeed or fail? Time will tell...as with any trader!...Except maybe you!?!
May be a good time to start an investment at schindler fund!!! When you have an equity curve with a positive expectancy its a good idea to add or start below the linear regression line. 30% DD when you can trade 90% a year is 3:1 still an amazing Risk Reward for a hedge fund. cheers