A system suits all stocks, except ETFs/QQQ/Etc.? Do you know Why?

Discussion in 'ETFs' started by OddTrader, Jul 1, 2008.

  1. Did you not understand the answer?
     
    #21     Jul 1, 2008
  2. #22     Jul 1, 2008
  3. ===========================================================================================

    Thread: Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Equities Journal II
    Post: Re: Re: Re: Re: Choppy Day
    Preview:
     
    #23     Jul 1, 2008
  4. What did this prove? What are you trying to get at?
     
    #24     Jul 1, 2008
  5. Tums

    Tums

    He's just playing dumb.
    He's been playing this game with Jack for years.
     
    #25     Jul 1, 2008
  6. Maybe the system is too based on earnings reports?
    (And their overreactions and corrections following reports)?
     
    #26     Jul 2, 2008
  7. doli

    doli

    Do not ETFs make turns?

    Cannot a profit per turn occur with an ETF?

    So why are ETFs unsuitable?


    Full Disclosure: 'i' may at times be negative, which can lead to bankruptcy.
     
    #27     Jul 2, 2008
  8. Probably the whole idea is to corner a few stocks by limiting the collectively available capital just to these few stocks that are called a selected universe generated by the method the individuals using. :D

    And only a few teachers of the method would have a chance to know all the stocks of individual's selected universe.

    For ETFs, not quite workable this cornering way! That's why! :D
     
    #28     Jul 2, 2008
  9. Really? Then why do you claim that the attached must be applied to a universe of screened stocks -- even though this paper is about the price, volume relationship and says nothing about PVT or a prescreened universe?
     
    #29     Jul 2, 2008
  10. schlap

    schlap Guest

    Hmmm.. Spyder is quite specific there, and no mention of a universe :eek:
     
    #30     Jul 2, 2008