You mean Maui? Well, that's available for everything but Linux it seems. Avalonia is what people use. I keep reading about all the Microsoft projects in this area and it's a complete disaster, from dead projects to half-dead projects to actively developed terrible projects. Fan of Qt myself as it's very clearly written and once you understand the concepts, they are easy to deploy.
I am not going to pitch anything from MS but Maui works, I have also used Avalonia, it was a good attempt but WPF is huge, Avalonia can't get anywhere to close to it.
True, but you can code in C# and use the UI framework asp.net core. It's a web based UI solution and the 2nd most popular framework and comes from Microsoft. You can also use C# to code using Blazor which runs web assemblies inside browsers and can basically take full advantage of local hardware resources. I would write any new UI application web based nowadays anyway...
Asp.net is the second most popular web UI framework. Is that popular enough? But I agree, MS has some bad past when it comes to developer support. But that's not the case anymore nowadays...
I consider myself an expert c# and wpf coder, though I have no formal cs background. Wpf is imo the absolutely best desktop UI language and toolbox, but it only runs natively on windows. You should check out some of the new stuff they do with code generators that automate the writing of all boiler plate code. Those are the old code generators: https://www.google.com/amp/s/montemagno.com/code-generation-from-xaml-in-visual-studio/amp/ Check out the new ones:
I can´t. I am a linuzzz boy. Too old to go back to Windows at this point. I use c# only for console apps and when I want a UI I use a SignalR server with plenty of dodgy Javascript. I am redeeming myself with imgui at the moment, but still learning to tame it.
Asp.net is for web applications. I was comparing stuff that runs on local hardware platforms, not web. It seems to be trending down but yes, still very popular. That stuff is much more elegant and compact in at least the Python versions of Qt. After watching the vid I'm glad to look at clean Python code. In the end to each their own. I definitely don't want to be stuck on Windows as I only use it for entertainment. Platform dependence is nauseating.
Indeed. And it already is no more functioning. Previously one simply could download a compressed archive of the project (w/o git clone etc.), now it does not work for me anymore. Seems this works only with their newest crap web browser (remember the old one, IE? Full with backdoors! ). Everything MS touches simply turns into...
The 'semi' part I am thinking of is, 1) confirmation of entry, as there are times when quantified conditions are met, while obviously not a good time to enter, for example, a rebound after a 30 points run; 2) which exit rule to be applied; this involves some chart recognition, which I am not able to code at this moment. I have tried many ideas by now, and fully automated quant system seems to be frustrating, as there will always be market conditions you never imagined.
The reason I am done with those 'concealed' platform, is that, you are playing with a black box. While for the open source software, like it said, with enough eye balls, the bugs in the code is easier to spot.