I concede that undicator lines can be most distracting and, depending on how the lines are tweaked, can sometimes detract from the proper and careful analysis of the underlying asset. It is principally for this reason that undicator lines are perhaps best ignored when considering entry. Better to focus on the steak rather than the sizzle.
I am sorry, please tell us more. Thunderdog! You should be ashamed of yourself! You are trying to distract a "serious analyst" from sharing his wisdom with us! I personally find his UNDICATOR very useful! I was in a crappy mood this morning (getting flu or something) and now I am all better and laughing! Thank you Joe Doaks (or is it Mocks?)
Much to my dismay, my previous attempts at screen capture have resulted in pesky restraining orders. I am therefore limited to analyzing this delightful phenomenon in real time (and at a distance).
Coincidentally, the restraining order brought tears to my eyes as well. However, I suspect that the blast of pepper spray that preceded it may well have been a contributing factor.
Well, you should be careful with those CONTRA UNDICATORS! You never know when they reverse on you! Iâd use tight mental stop losses to be on the safe side!
Not necessarily. While secondary research certainly has its place in the scheme of things, it pales in comparison to the value of primary research. Go out there and collect your own data. A word to the wise: you may wish to consider protective goggles if you anticipate volatility.