@padutrader Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. That’s all you’ve been doing. At least alongside name calling, attack the argument with counter arguments and provide empirical evidence like me.
ok i have spoken to Harvard school i have recommended you for Dean so that you can lecture everyone instead of teaching fuc*kers idiots morons in ET
sure i get it it takes a fraud... to know a fraud. i never knew you could fraud using a screen shot. how do you know that.
I find it hilarious that you’re so desperate for my trading history. 1) Even if I post, it can never be verified. I can also decide to post only good trades and hide bad trades; if such trades even exist. Lol 2) I decline for the same reason RenTech wouldn’t give you a screenshot of their trades. 3) I’ve provided you proof behind my claims with empirical evidence. 4) Statements can be fabricated. Like Madoffs... 5) I can find a statement from some other place on the internet and make it appear as if it is mine. You think me posting a screenshot is proof. It’s proof of nothing.