We define ‘randomness’ as incomplete information as it relates to data produced from market activity/markets. Once someone recognizes that the data is constructed randomly & not with a precise intended message of the future, they can save themselves a LOT of trouble. This means that any tool used to infer the past to predict the future, is insufficient in dealing with this randomness phenomena. We’ve proven empirically that markets do not carry a precise intended message of the future. That it does not contain complete information where someone can apply a tool to measure and infer the past to predict the future like they haphazardly do today. They do this with full confidence that this is the way and their strategy is built around this alone. They go further and assume that it is Gaussian and begin to ignore the tails as if it’s some “error” that “shouldn’t have happened”. Therefore, only using tools that infer the past to predict the future is not a robust strategy. Retail day traders foolishly use Technical Analysis to do this. Technical Analysis shows you information of the past, such as volume etc, but it’s in the misinterpretation of this that traders get lost and come to the wrong conclusions. @themickey Heres something useful for you.
The moment Goldman’s Sachs admits this... They won’t be able to convince fools of their clickbaiting prediction nonsense: “Goldman’s Sachs predict markets are going to go to Y this September” “Goldman’s sachs predicts markets are going to go X this October” “Goldman’s sachs predicts markets are going to act like Z this December” They know it, they just won’t admit it. Also, I never claimed to be a genius. Thx.
what you are still here . HERE AMONG ALL THE LOSERS WHAT DOES THAT MAKE YOU. GO WRITE YOUR BOOK TRADERS ARE PRAYING FOR YOUR BOOK
You’ve blown up your accounts precisely for that reason, and will continue to do as is made apparent by your strategy in your journal. This is why I say... good luck to you.
BUT YOU ARE HIDING YOUR JOURNAL you are saying posting journal is fraud. so that means my blowing accounts is fraud you think anyone can lose money for 30 years and still be solvent i am only a lot more humble than you bye